Re: regressions: tuplet-bracket-cross-staff.ly

2008-02-26 Thread Joe Neeman
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 15:53 -0600, Stan Sanderson wrote: > On Feb 26, 2008, at 1:27 PM, Joe Neeman wrote: > > > On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 13:13 -0600, Stan Sanderson wrote: > >> 2.11.41 regressions- tuplet-bracket-cross-staff.ly > >> > >> Problem: the bracket

Re: regressions: tuplet-bracket-cross-staff.ly

2008-02-26 Thread Stan Sanderson
On Feb 26, 2008, at 1:27 PM, Joe Neeman wrote: On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 13:13 -0600, Stan Sanderson wrote: 2.11.41 regressions- tuplet-bracket-cross-staff.ly Problem: the bracket for the third tuplet (extending across three staffs) does not draw properly. It did in 2.39 and 2.40. Yes, I

Re: regressions: tuplet-bracket-cross-staff.ly

2008-02-26 Thread Joe Neeman
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 13:13 -0600, Stan Sanderson wrote: > 2.11.41 regressions- tuplet-bracket-cross-staff.ly > > Problem: the bracket for the third tuplet (extending across three > staffs) does not draw properly. It did in 2.39 and 2.40. Yes, I changed this intentionally. Mak

regressions: tuplet-bracket-cross-staff.ly

2008-02-26 Thread Stan Sanderson
2.11.41 regressions- tuplet-bracket-cross-staff.ly Problem: the bracket for the third tuplet (extending across three staffs) does not draw properly. It did in 2.39 and 2.40. Stan ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http

Re: regressions: tuplet-bracket-cross-staff.ly

2008-01-08 Thread Valentin Villenave
2008/1/8, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 21:07:07 +0100 > "Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What do you mean by 'a note'? > > { a'4 } Oh, I thought "make a note to Han-Wen" or something like that... Valentin _

Re: regressions: tuplet-bracket-cross-staff.ly

2008-01-08 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 21:07:07 +0100 "Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/1/8, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Just make a note to examine it in 2.11.38 -- since all of our > > lilyponds compile the file correctly individually, we can't really > > claim that the snippet

Re: regressions: tuplet-bracket-cross-staff.ly

2008-01-08 Thread Valentin Villenave
2008/1/8, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Just make a note to examine it in 2.11.38 -- since all of our > lilyponds compile the file correctly individually, we can't really > claim that the snippet is broken. At least, not yet. What do you mean by 'a note'? Shall I open an issue? Anyway,

Re: regressions: tuplet-bracket-cross-staff.ly

2008-01-08 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 02:22:01 +0100 "Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/1/5, Stan Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > While the snippet renders correctly when I compile it, the image > > rendered in the regression/collated-files document (using Firefox > > 2.0.0.11, Mac OS 10.4.11,

Re: regressions: tuplet-bracket-cross-staff.ly

2008-01-05 Thread Valentin Villenave
2008/1/5, Stan Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > While the snippet renders correctly when I compile it, the image > rendered in the regression/collated-files document (using Firefox > 2.0.0.11, Mac OS 10.4.11, PPC) is incorrect. The third tuplet bracket > (for the tuplet crossing three staves) is no

regressions: tuplet-bracket-cross-staff.ly

2008-01-05 Thread Stan Sanderson
regressions: tuplet-bracket-cross-staff.ly - strange rendering While the snippet renders correctly when I compile it, the image rendered in the regression/collated-files document (using Firefox 2.0.0.11, Mac OS 10.4.11, PPC) is incorrect. The third tuplet bracket (for the tuplet crossing