On Mar 12, 2008, at 11:51 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:39:34 -0300
"Han-Wen Nienhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2008/3/9, Stan Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2.11.42 regressions: property-nested-reverted.ly
problem: reversion not complete- is th
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:39:34 -0300
"Han-Wen Nienhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/3/9, Stan Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > 2.11.42 regressions: property-nested-reverted.ly
> >
> > problem: reversion not complete- is there missing code?
>
&
2008/3/9, Stan Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2.11.42 regressions: property-nested-reverted.ly
>
> problem: reversion not complete- is there missing code?
No, I think the objective is to show that you can revert individual
nested properties, without affecting others. The imple
2.11.42 regressions: property-nested-reverted.ly
problem: reversion not complete- is there missing code?
current code:
==
\version "2.11.15"
\relative {
f2 \glissando c
\override Glissando #'bound-details #'right #'Y = #4
f2 \glissando c |
\override
