On 01/02/14 10:14, Eluze wrote:
pkx166h wrote
On 01/02/14 09:44, Eluze wrote:
in NR 2.19.1 Appendix D + E, a lot of commands are listed /with/ and
/without/ the backslash - this seems unnecessary
some commands - eg. \single, \temporary and \undo - are only listed
/without/ backslash
imo comma
if only indirectly.
thanks for the pointer!
as this is already recognized and in work the other point remains:
add \single, \temporary \undo and more to the index - is that worth an
entry in the tracker!?
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/redun
James writes:
> On 01/02/14 09:44, Eluze wrote:
>> in NR 2.19.1 Appendix D + E, a lot of commands are listed /with/ and
>> /without/ the backslash - this seems unnecessary
>>
>> some commands - eg. \single, \temporary and \undo - are only listed
>> /without/ backslash
>>
>> imo commands should al
On 01/02/14 09:44, Eluze wrote:
in NR 2.19.1 Appendix D + E, a lot of commands are listed /with/ and
/without/ the backslash - this seems unnecessary
some commands - eg. \single, \temporary and \undo - are only listed
/without/ backslash
imo commands should always be quoted including the backsl
recognizable as commands.
counter-opinions?
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/redundant-entries-in-the-indexes-are-confusing-and-lessening-the-clarity-tp158696.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com
