2013/9/15 David Kastrup
> "doesn't sound good" is the understatement of the year. Yes, this
> description is most definitely very, very wrong.
>
ok, just added an issue:
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3556
___
bug-lilypond mailing
Federico Bruni writes:
> 2013/9/15 Janek Warchoł
>
>> 2013/9/15 Federico Bruni :
>> > Can you tell me what the two values refer to and what's the final value
>> of
>> > ledger-line-thickness?
>>
>> \override StaffSymbol.ledger-line-thickness = #'(a . b)
>> means ledger-line-thickness = a*staffli
2013/9/15 Janek Warchoł
> 2013/9/15 Federico Bruni :
> > Can you tell me what the two values refer to and what's the final value
> of
> > ledger-line-thickness?
>
> \override StaffSymbol.ledger-line-thickness = #'(a . b)
> means ledger-line-thickness = a*staffline thickness + b*staffspace
>
ok,
Federico Bruni wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm translating NR 1.6 and I've found a sentence which is
> not straightforward:
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/modifying-single-staves
>
> """
> However, it is possible to set ledger line thickness
> independently of staff lines. The two value
2013/9/15 Federico Bruni :
> Can you tell me what the two values refer to and what's the final value of
> ledger-line-thickness?
\override StaffSymbol.ledger-line-thickness = #'(a . b)
means ledger-line-thickness = a*staffline thickness + b*staffspace
An example below.
\new Staff \with {
\overr
Hi
I'm translating NR 1.6 and I've found a sentence which is not
straightforward:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/modifying-single-staves
"""
However, it is possible to set ledger line thickness independently of staff
lines. The two values required multiply the staff line thi
