Mats Bengtsson wrote:
The idea of the changed behaviour of \skip was exactly that it shouldn't
create a new Staff context. However, then you still have to watch out
that you don't include anything else in your \global that needs a
Staff context to live in. As long as you don't use
\RemoveEmptySta
Paul Scott wrote:
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
I hope you don't have the magic line
\paper { \translator { \RemoveEmptyStaffContext } }
left in your input file, since it will remove the extra stave
from the printed score but it will still affect the spacing as
Han-Wen explained.
Indeed I do. I see
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
I hope you don't have the magic line
\paper { \translator { \RemoveEmptyStaffContext } }
left in your input file, since it will remove the extra stave
from the printed score but it will still affect the spacing as
Han-Wen explained.
Indeed I do. I see that I don't the "m
I hope you don't have the magic line
\paper { \translator { \RemoveEmptyStaffContext } }
left in your input file, since it will remove the extra stave
from the printed score but it will still affect the spacing as
Han-Wen explained.
/Mats
Paul Scott wrote:
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Yes, but if
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Yes, but if you replace any \skip by an 's' in the \global, you will
get the extra stave, that's what I tried to say above.
No. I've been working with that form with 's' and not \skip for a couple
of hours without any extra staff. 2.1.25.
*But* it does bring back the space
Paul Scott wrote:
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Thanks. Using:
\score
\context Staff <<
\global
{ \part }
>>
}
for a part and
\score
\context StaffGroup <<
\global
\new Staff { \part1 }
\new Staff { \part2 }
>>
}
for similar parts seems to work (key signature s
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Thanks. Using:
\score
\context Staff <<
\global
{ \part }
>>
}
for a part and
\score
\context StaffGroup <<
\global
\new Staff { \part1 }
\new Staff { \part2 }
>>
}
for similar parts seems to work (key signature spacing is good). I
Thanks. Using:
\score
\context Staff <<
\global
{ \part }
>>
}
for a part and
\score
\context StaffGroup <<
\global
\new Staff { \part1 }
\new Staff { \part2 }
>>
}
for similar parts seems to work (key signature spacing is good). I will
now see what happ
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Paul Scott wrote:
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
The original problem turned out to be that you had a separate
line of "music" containing time signatures and bar lines that
ended up in a separate Staff context.
I thought that Han-Wen changed \skip to fix that.
A simple solutio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Another question is why this additional stave destroys the spacing
> calculations, but that's beyond my comprehension at the moment.
The desired spacing for each staff is different, so a compromise has
to be found. In many "normal" cases, taking the maximum of all
d
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes. If you use current CVS, that is.
In 2.1.24 \skip no longer fixes the space after key signature problem.
please send demonstration file.
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
I may have been in error here.
Paul Scott wrote:
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
The original problem turned out to be that you had a separate
line of "music" containing time signatures and bar lines that
ended up in a separate Staff context.
I thought that Han-Wen changed \skip to fix that.
A simple solution to that
is to explicit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >Yes. If you use current CVS, that is.
> >
> In 2.1.24 \skip no longer fixes the space after key signature problem.
please send demonstration file.
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4a
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
The original problem turned out to be that you had a separate
line of "music" containing time signatures and bar lines that
ended up in a separate Staff context.
I thought that Han-Wen changed \skip to fix that.
A simple solution to that
is to explicitly include this line o
The original problem turned out to be that you had a separate
line of "music" containing time signatures and bar lines that
ended up in a separate Staff context. A simple solution to that
is to explicitly include this line of "music" in an existing Staff
context. In your original example from
http:
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
level. Therefore, I have altered the definition of \skip to be
different from "s", so that \skip may be used like you did.
So I should use \skip in my globals instead of s?
Yes. If you use current CVS, that is.
In 2.1.24 \skip
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
level. Therefore, I have altered the definition of \skip to be
different from "s", so that \skip may be used like you did.
So I should use \skip in my globals instead of s?
Yes. If you use current CVS, that is.
Pedro has been
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >>level. Therefore, I have altered the definition of \skip to be
> >>different from "s", so that \skip may be used like you did.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> So I should use \skip in my globals instead of s?
Yes. If you use current CVS, that is.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In the last several versions including 2.1.5 there is no space after a
key signature unless there is a time signature.
The problem is caused by
dyxxvicom = \notes{
\time 2/2 s1*3 \repeat volta 2 { s1 } s1*20
\time 4/4 s1*40 \bar "|."
}
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> In the last several versions including 2.1.5 there is no space after a
> key signature unless there is a time signature.
>
The problem is caused by
> dyxxvicom = \notes{
> \time 2/2 s1*3 \repeat volta 2 { s1 } s1*20
> \time 4/4 s1*40 \bar "|."
> }
> \score {
In the last several versions including 2.1.5 there is no space after a
key signature unless there is a time signature.
Paul Scott
%\include "dy26notes.ly"
\include "english.ly"
%\header {
%title= "26. Good Old Days"
%subtitle = "Damn Yankees"
%piece= "Reed 2 - Clarinet"
%}
d
21 matches
Mail list logo
