On 4/4/06, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> It seems that I have fixed this problem on accident again in 2.8.1-2
> (without actually knowing how I did it.) -- Please have a go, YMMV.
Works for me, thanks.
___
bug-
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
dave k wrote:
2.8.0-5 fortunately fixed the problem of Lilypond running slowly on
Windows
(having to recreate the font cache every time), but this problem has
returned in
2.8.1-1.
Yes, I can verify. Unfortunately, I'm a bit flabbergasted about why it
fell over once
> dave k wrote:
> > 2.8.0-5 fortunately fixed the problem of Lilypond running slowly on
Windows
> > (having to recreate the font cache every time), but this problem has
returned in
> > 2.8.1-1.
>
> Yes, I can verify. Unfortunately, I'm a bit flabbergasted about why it
> fell over once again.
>
> I
dave k wrote:
2.8.0-5 fortunately fixed the problem of Lilypond running slowly on Windows
(having to recreate the font cache every time), but this problem has returned in
2.8.1-1.
Yes, I can verify. Unfortunately, I'm a bit flabbergasted about why it
fell over once again.
I suggest to use t
2.8.0-5 fortunately fixed the problem of Lilypond running slowly on Windows
(having to recreate the font cache every time), but this problem has returned in
2.8.1-1.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listin
