On Tuesday 02 August 2005 14.10, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> > (although I'm surprised that Ubuntu doesn't ship the latest GS).
>
> Ubuntu is a snapshot of debian/unstable with extra user-experience
> polish. Only since July 15th, 8.15 is in debian (fixing a whishlist
>
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> (although I'm surprised that Ubuntu doesn't ship the latest GS).
Ubuntu is a snapshot of debian/unstable with extra user-experience
polish. Only since July 15th, 8.15 is in debian (fixing a whishlist
bug from a lilypond user :-)
Maybe we could check a specific gs fe
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> I guess we should check for GS 8.x and not GS 8.15 specifically
> (although I'm surprised that Ubuntu doesn't ship the latest GS).
The last time I checked, debian's gs-8.01 and gs-8.14 did not work.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The
Guy Banay wrote:
I didn't know that, but maybe I should've guessed. Anyway, GS-ESP-8.01
(the one that's installed by default on Ubuntu 5.04) generates
readable pdf without complaining.
I guess we should check for GS 8.x and not GS 8.15 specifically
(although I'm surprised that Ubuntu doesn't
> You could always, of course, first extract the autopackage and install
> the contained ghostscript package manually.
Sure, if you could install to /usr/local and have it Just Work (TM)
that'd be very nice.
But I already tried that before sending my first message and it
doesn't work - if autopack
On Thursday 28 July 2005 11.38, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Erik Sandberg writes:
> > I have the same problem (I reported it earlier), with the full package. I
> > get the following message when installing:
> >
> > # Checking for Ghostscript ... failed
> > # FAILED:
> > # Package 'Ghostscript' was f
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Erik Sandberg writes:
I have the same problem (I reported it earlier), with the full package. I get
the following message when installing:
# Checking for Ghostscript ... failed
# FAILED:
# Package 'Ghostscript' was found but was of the wrong version and the correc
Erik Sandberg writes:
> I have the same problem (I reported it earlier), with the full package. I get
> the following message when installing:
>
> # Checking for Ghostscript ... failed
> # FAILED:
> # Package 'Ghostscript' was found but was of the wrong version and the correct
> version could not
On Thursday 28 July 2005 08.37, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Guy Banay writes:
> > The Lilypond autopackage (version 2.6.1) will not install on systems
> > without Ghostscript >= 8.15 despite GS being an optional runtime
> > dependancy and lilypond can run without it.
>
> What does `will not install'
Guy Banay writes:
> The Lilypond autopackage (version 2.6.1) will not install on systems
> without Ghostscript >= 8.15 despite GS being an optional runtime
> dependancy and lilypond can run without it.
What does `will not install' mean? Did you try the full package?
> It would be more appropria
The Lilypond autopackage (version 2.6.1) will not install on systems
without Ghostscript >= 8.15 despite GS being an optional runtime
dependancy and lilypond can run without it. It would be more
appropriate imho to issue a warning but let the installation complete,
especially considering that even
11 matches
Mail list logo
