> Then maybe always use a 3-digit number 001 ... 999
As the default this is OK with me. However, I still prefer a command
line option that can provide a template for image names.
Werner
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://
> Imho, lilypond could be smart about it and choose the number of
> leading 0's according to need.
> for instance
> 01,02,...09,10,11
> in case of 11 pages, instead of
> 1,2,...,9,10,11 (as it is right now) which may result in non-canonic
> ordering of files.
> This is the solution that I would ad
Imho, lilypond could be smart about it and choose the number of leading 0's
according to need.
for instance
01,02,...09,10,11
in case of 11 pages, instead of
1,2,...,9,10,11 (as it is right now) which may result in non-canonic
ordering of files.
This is the solution that I would advacate for.
The
> I noticed that the image filenames of the pages are of the form
>
> PNG:
> -page1.png
> -page2.png
> ...
>
> SVG
> -page-1.svg
> -page-2.svg
> ...
>
> I.e. in case of svg there is an additional "-".
>
> Wouldn't it be nicer to have just one filename type?
Definitely. Ideally, there should be a
Hi,
I noticed that the image filenames of the pages are of the form
PNG:
-page1.png
-page2.png
...
SVG
-page-1.svg
-page-2.svg
...
I.e. in case of svg there is an additional "-".
Wouldn't it be nicer to have just one filename type?
many greetings,
Jan
_
