[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
> Now, I understand enough about this (I think) that this is a safegaurd
> against overwriting some configuration files. I don't recall having
> done anything to these config files so is it probably safe to remove the
> '.rpmnew' and append '.old' on the old files?
On Sat, 2004-04-10 at 19:56, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > your best bet would be the tetex from Fedora core 1, because it is
> > > closest related to RH9.
> >
> > Ok, do I need anything other than the obvious (obvious = tetex-*)?
>
> no, probably not.
Han-Wen/Jan,
T
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > your best bet would be the tetex from Fedora core 1, because it is
> > closest related to RH9.
>
> Ok, do I need anything other than the obvious (obvious = tetex-*)?
no, probably not.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
On Sat, 2004-04-10 at 19:12, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > It's a bit annoying that RedHat hasn't seen fit to update this package in
> > their distribution. Then again, RedHat 9 will see no more updates/errata
> > fixes after the end of this month anyway so maybe I should
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> It's a bit annoying that RedHat hasn't seen fit to update this package in
> their distribution. Then again, RedHat 9 will see no more updates/errata
> fixes after the end of this month anyway so maybe I should look for a
> different distribution. Before I do that (and
At 07:15 PM 4/7/2004 +0200, you wrote:
>David Bobroff writes:
>
>>> kpsewhich f7b6d320.enc
>>
>> Nothing, I'm just returned to the prompt.
>
>> tetex-1.0.7-66
>
>Ouch, in three weeks that will be four years old. Would it be
>acceptable to ask for an upgrade?
Ouch, indeed. I checked around an
David Bobroff writes:
>> kpsewhich f7b6d320.enc
>
> Nothing, I'm just returned to the prompt.
> tetex-1.0.7-66
Ouch, in three weeks that will be four years old. Would it be
acceptable to ask for an upgrade?
I'm a bit reluctant to include missing tetex files into lilypond, just
to be compat
On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 16:12, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> David Bobroff writes:
>
> > Apparently not. This is what I get now:
> >
> > Calculating line breaks... warning: kpathsea can not find file:
> > `f7b6d320.enc'
> > error: can't find file: `f7b6d320.enc'
>
> Strange. What does:
>
> kpse
David Bobroff writes:
> Apparently not. This is what I get now:
>
> Calculating line breaks... warning: kpathsea can not find file:
> `f7b6d320.enc'
> error: can't find file: `f7b6d320.enc'
Strange. What does:
kpsewhich f7b6d320.enc
say? What version of tetex do you have?
Jan.
--
Jan
On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 16:00, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>
> If you don't understand, you probably don't need this (no offence
> intended).
>
> There are two supported ways to run lilypond, the usual way is:
>
>./configure; make; make install; cd ~; lilypond
>
> but you can also omit the `make
David Bobroff writes:
>> That depends on how you run LilyPond. If you run from the build
>> directory, you can try:
>>
>> rm -rf share
>> make
>>
>> which should fix it. If you install and then run, lilypond won't look
>> in the original source dir, of course.
>>
>
> I'm not sure I en
On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 15:06, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> That depends on how you run LilyPond. If you run from the build
> directory, you can try:
>
> rm -rf share
> make
>
> which should fix it. If you install and then run, lilypond won't look
> in the original source dir, of course.
>
On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 15:06, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> David Bobroff writes:
>
> > Interpreting music... warning: kpathsea can not find file: `feta20.enc'
> > error: can't find file: `feta20.enc'
> >
> > Yet it is located in
> >
> > /usr/src/lilypond/mf/out/feta20.enc
> >
> > Is this where it sh
David Bobroff writes:
> Interpreting music... warning: kpathsea can not find file: `feta20.enc'
> error: can't find file: `feta20.enc'
>
> Yet it is located in
>
> /usr/src/lilypond/mf/out/feta20.enc
>
> Is this where it should be? Should it have been moved somewhere else?
That depends on how y
I posted something about this on the user list a bit earlier today. I
think there is something amiss with the current CVS (ChangeLog 1.2033).
I get:
Interpreting music... warning: kpathsea can not find file: `feta20.enc'
error: can't find file: `feta20.enc'
Yet it is located in
/usr/src/lily
15 matches
Mail list logo
