bb writes:
> The essential point: The case of nested block comments is not mentioned
> in the manual. (Or I cannot find it?)
>
> #
>
> off topic:
>
> Have you heard about Lua? Nice language!
>
> | print ("This will be printed first")
>
> --[===[ Comment out a
Am 26.05.2018 um 20:15 schrieb bb:
On top of the code snippet you have the version number. If one starts
the code, I get an unexpected but descriptive error message. Something
unclear?
Strictly speaking, yes.
You expect people to copy your code example and execute it in LilyPond,
without giv
Sorry, I did not read the learning manual, I read the "normal" manual
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/usage/invoking-convert_002dly.en.html
and I found
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/usage.pdf
I actually searched for "nested" - no hit.
Anyway, I know that everything is
Sorry, I did not read the learning manual, I read the "normal" manual
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/usage/invoking-convert_002dly.en.html
and I found
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/usage.pdf
I actually searched for "nested" - no hit.
Anyway, I know that everything is
t;> The essential point: The case of nested block comments is not
>> mentioned in the manual. (Or I cannot find it?)
>>
>>
>
> Maybe the essential point is to write properly to the (bug-lilypond)
> when you want to get someone to do anything on your behalf.
>
> Your p
On 26 May 2018 at 18:46, bb wrote:
> The essential point: The case of nested block comments is not mentioned
> in the manual. (Or I cannot find it?)
>
It most certainly is. Section 1.2.2 in the learning manual states that:
"A block comment marks a whole section of music input as a comment.
Anyt
was titled "comment bug", with no further comment to it. And
apart from being pretty impolite this is simply not accurate, much less
a useful bug report.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/li
Forgot Clojure, a wonderful modern functional language I recommend
;; comment can also be written as (comment …)
(comment this is a
block comment.
(comment block comment can be nested.)
)
Am 26.05.2018 um 18:46 schrieb bb:
>
> The essential point: The case of nested block comments is not
> men
The essential point: The case of nested block comments is not mentioned
in the manual. (Or I cannot find it?)
#
off topic:
Have you heard about Lua? Nice language!
| print ("This will be printed first")
--[===[ Comment out a whole big block!
--[[ This
Am 26. Mai 2018 17:43:19 MESZ schrieb Andrew Bernard :
>Isn't it simply that you can't have nested block comments?
I can't think of any language that allows nested multiline comments.
Urs
>
>Andrew
>
>
>On 27 May 2018 at 01:14, bb wrote:
>
>>
>> \version "2.19.80"
>>
>> %{
>> \score {
>> <<
Isn't it simply that you can't have nested block comments?
Andrew
On 27 May 2018 at 01:14, bb wrote:
>
> \version "2.19.80"
>
> %{
> \score {
> <<
> %{
> %some code
> %}
> >>
> }
> %}
>
>
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.
\version "2.19.80"
%{
\score {
<<
%{
%some code
%}
>>
}
%}
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
12 matches
Mail list logo
