Eluze writes:
> David Kastrup wrote
>> Eluze <
>
>> eluzew@
>
>> > writes:
>>
>>> David Kastrup wrote
>>
>> And then I would be afraid that it would do something besides cleaning
>> up the backups, some conversion or so. When using rm *.ly.~* I know
>> exactly what will happen.
>
> and this wo
displayed:
-c, --current-version
force updating \version number to 2.17.29
shall I rise a documentation request for these two little items?
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/clean-numbered-backups-with-convert-ly-tp152870p152
Eluze writes:
> David Kastrup wrote
>> Eluze <
>
>> eluzew@
>
>> > writes:
>>
>>> (sorry I can't remember exactly where that was) I tried a new patch to
>>> get
>>> rid of these numerous backups:
>>>
>>> -k --clean-numbered-backup - "clean numbered backups
>>> [filename.ext.~number~]"
>>>
>> As
write
>
> -xyz paramx paramy paramz
>
> but sometimes the interpretation instead leads to
>
> -xparamx -yparamy -zparamz
>
>> in the end of the chapter *2.3 Command line options for convert-ly*
>
> This is usually assumed to be common knowledge, but of cou
sorry, forgot the new file: convert-ly.py
<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n152872/convert-ly.py>
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/clean-numbered-backups-with-convert-ly-tp152870p152872.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list arch
Eluze writes:
> carried away by my success in contributing a little patch for convert-ly in
> Python and inspired by dak's sentence "numbered backups tend to accumulate"
> (sorry I can't remember exactly where that was) I tried a new patch to get
> rid of these numerous backups:
>
> -k --clean-nu
thanks for taking a look at this!
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/clean-numbered-backups-with-convert-ly-tp152870.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
bug-lilypond mailing lis
