[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > The chord-naming scheme is consistent with Ignatzek's book. If you
> > prefer another system, you're welcome to code support for it.
> >
> > Han-Wen
> > (Getting very tired of yet another chord name request)
>
> I'm just curious: Does this book say that \chords c^3 a
> The chord-naming scheme is consistent with Ignatzek's book. If you
> prefer another system, you're welcome to code support for it.
>
> Han-Wen
> (Getting very tired of yet another chord name request)
I'm just curious: Does this book say that \chords c^3 and \chords c should be
typeset identica
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Thanks for trying. daveA
And *you* are saying this to *me*?
You can also throw out your computer with the trash, and write parts
by hand, you know.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
On Wednesday 24 March 2004 06:49, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The chord-naming scheme is consistent
Each slash below means something very different, according
to the "system":
Cmaj7/9/E /
Thanks for trying. daveA
--
Paying more at the gas pump? Bush's Oil Sheikh Bu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> to work. These chords are really
> beautiful, and something very bad is happening to them.
Is this a bugreport - if yes, please be clear about your gripes.
> a:maj7+9 s s % this chord is supposed to be an A9maj7 or Amaj9
> % or Amaj7add9 or Amaj79. Inste
%{ bugs.ly
I can't begin to tell you how happy I am that I finally got this
to work. These chords are really
beautiful, and something very bad is happening to them.
Apparently, the "piece" and "poet" have been reversed
for a long time for some reason. How about fi
