Thanks Mats -- it just struck me as a bug because it is standard
notation and commonly called for. I was hoping there's some way to make
it automatic in the development version.
Qian
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> Yes, we have seen your question a number of times (see the
___
Yes, we have seen your question a number of times (see the
mailing list archives if you are uncertain. Note, though, that
they are only updated every midnight).
Also, you should have received one answer yesterday.
This kind of questions belong to the lilypond-user mailing list,
where they reach the
I don't believe this made it to the list the first time:
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 00:54:09 -0500, Qian Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using version 2.2.5.
>
> I am trying to write many groups of four 16th-notes some of which are
> separated by 16th-rest value spacers. When I force-beam the not
I am using version 2.2.5.
I am trying to write many groups of four 16th-notes some of which are
separated by 16th-rest value spacers. When I force-beam the notes over
any spacer, the double beam is continuous instead of single over the
spacer. My current solution is massively wordy, requires rep
