Thanks for the clarification! This has now been added as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=484
Cheers,
- Graham
Andreas von Heydwolff wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
Hi Andreas,
I kind-of lost track of this bug. I just tested it with 2.11.33, and
it certainly displays some o
Hi Andreas,
I kind-of lost track of this bug. I just tested it with 2.11.33, and it
certainly displays some output, but I don't know if it's correct or not.
Could you test with the 2.11.33 binary and let me know if it's the
wrong type of mirrorflat ?
Cheers,
- Graha,
Andreas von Heydwolf
Graham Percival wrote:
Do we distribute makam-init.ly ? I can't find this file in the 2.11.32
binary. There's certainly _a_ bug here...
Cheers,Graham Percival wrote:
Do we distribute makam-init.ly ? I can't find this file in the 2.11.32
binary. There's certainly _a_ bug here...
Cheers,
Do we distribute makam-init.ly ? I can't find this file in the 2.11.32
binary. There's certainly _a_ bug here...
Cheers,
- Graham
Andreas von Heydwolff wrote:
I'm not top posting.
%% accidentals.mirroredflat.backslash has been switched on but
%% accidentals.mirroredflat appears
\version "
> I'm not top posting.
%% accidentals.mirroredflat.backslash has been switched on but
%% accidentals.mirroredflat appears
\version "2.11.32"
%% actually it is \version "2.11.pre33", so to speak, from git as of 15 Sept
2007
eksikMirroredSlashedFlat = ##t
\include "makam-init.ly"
{
\relative
