Re: Windows V2.11.62 and V2.11.63 report version number as V2.11.61 - SOLVED

2008-11-09 Thread Ian Hulin
Risto Vääräniemi wrote: Hi Ian, 2008/11/1 Ian Hulin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: The last kits for Windows I installed for 2.11.62 and 2.11.63 say they are 2.11.61 when Do you have also 2.11.61 installed on your system but on a different path? I have the same situation every time I install a new ver

Re: Windows V2.11.62 and V2.11.63 report version number as V2.11.61

2008-11-03 Thread Risto Vääräniemi
Hi Ian, 2008/11/1 Ian Hulin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The last kits for Windows I installed for 2.11.62 > and 2.11.63 say they are > 2.11.61 when Do you have also 2.11.61 installed on your system but on a different path? I have the same situation every time I install a new version. If you install a

Re: Windows V2.11.62 and V2.11.63 report version number as V2.11.61

2008-10-31 Thread Eluze
luze -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Windows-V2.11.62-and-V2.11.63-report-version-number-as-V2.11.61-tp20275292p20275450.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ bug-lilypond mailing lis

Windows V2.11.62 and V2.11.63 report version number as V2.11.61

2008-10-31 Thread Ian Hulin
Hi all, (Originally posted in user forum by mistake). The last kits for Windows I installed for 2.11.62 and 2.11.63 say they are 2.11.61 when I do lilypond from a command window, But a compilation still barfs if I include something that has become obsolescent with 2.11.62 like \bigger in my so