On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 06:32:55PM +0200, James Bailey wrote:
>
> On 05.06.2010, at 11:48, Graham Percival wrote:
>
>> I've updated CG 7 Issues:
>> http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/contributor/issues.html
>
> Maybe it's simply how I process information, but I think of the list at
> 7.1
On 6/5/10 10:32 AM, "James Bailey" wrote:
>
> Maybe it's simply how I process information, but I think of the list
> at 7.1 as:
> Is #1 true? Yes, proceed. No? Go to #2
> Is #2 true? Yes, proceed. No? Go to #3S
>
> Given that order of operations, I think it would make more sense for
> the order
On 05.06.2010, at 11:48, Graham Percival wrote:
Hi Bug Squad and others,
I've updated CG 7 Issues:
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/contributor/issues.html
Note that this URL goes to kainhofer; the official online docs
won't be updated until 2.13.24, and it's too early for that.
On 6/5/10 7:17 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>
> The Enhancement bit says "if in doubt, make it an enhancement".
> Beyond that, I'm not certain how to clarify these points, either in
> our "understood" policy or written policy.
OK. I'm happy with that.
Thanks,
Carl
_
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> Section 7.1: "behaviour" --> "behavior"; U.S. spelling
Oops, yeah. Ok, I've "fixed" this. (I've been trying to get in
practice writing British, since my thesis has to be written in
British, instead of the customary Canadian wherein we c
Section 7.1: "behaviour" --> "behavior"; U.S. spelling
Section 7.2: Type -- IMO, Defect is when LilyPond doesn't do what it says it
does. Enhancement is when you want LilyPond to do something new. But if you
don't want to change the statements in the docs, that's fine with me.
Looks great!
T
Hi Bug Squad and others,
I've updated CG 7 Issues:
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/contributor/issues.html
Note that this URL goes to kainhofer; the official online docs
won't be updated until 2.13.24, and it's too early for that.
I generally discourage links to kainhofer, since it'
