On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Valentin Villenave
wrote:
> - this snippet is some kind of a hack anyway, and IIRC your official
> policy is that "convert-ly must handle pristine LilyPond code, but if
> you use hacks then you're on your own" :-)
Hmm, good point.
That's not _quite_ my official
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> I don't know if you're missing anything, but *I'm* missing a
> Type-Scripts Priority-Medium issue about this. Somebody should
> definitely add one.
There you go:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1373
The reason why I d
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 9:50 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Valentin Villenave writes:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
>>> Not sure what to raise an issue about concerning convert.ly, though.
>>
>> convert-ly prints a NOT_SMART message, but for TextSpanner instead of
>> Tril
