Re: Staff Stretching problem in 2.13.50+

2011-03-10 Thread Graham Percival
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 06:10:46PM +, James Lowe wrote: > Graham, > > From: Graham Percival > >> \relative c'' { > >> \time 3/8 > >> \compressFullBarRests > >> R1*19*3/8 \break| cis4. | d8 r r | R1*2*3/8 | cis4. | d8 r r | \break > >> R1*20*3/8 > >> } > > > >In which universe do you con

Re: Issue 1553 in lilypond: Staff stretching problem in 2.13.50+

2011-03-10 Thread lilypond
Updates: Labels: -Priority-Critical Priority-Medium Comment #4 on issue 1553 by percival.music.ca: Staff stretching problem in 2.13.50+ http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1553 Ok, good argument. ___ bug-lilypond mailing

Re: Issue 1553 in lilypond: Staff stretching problem in 2.13.50+

2011-03-09 Thread lilypond
Comment #3 on issue 1553 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: Staff stretching problem in 2.13.50+ http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1553 but where exactly do you propose that \noBreak should be placed? I should have used the plural. \noBreak s at every bar in the troublesome line

Re: Staff Stretching problem in 2.13.50+

2011-03-09 Thread James Lowe
Graham, -Original Message- From: Graham Percival Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 12:52:59 + To: James Lowe Cc: Keith OHara , bug-lilypond Subject: Re: Staff Stretching problem in 2.13.50+ >On 3/9/11, James Lowe wrote: >> Actually if you go back to my example that I reported

Re: Issue 1553 in lilypond: Staff stretching problem in 2.13.50+

2011-03-09 Thread lilypond
Comment #2 on issue 1553 by percival.music.ca: Staff stretching problem in 2.13.50+ http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1553 Sorry for a case of the stupids, but where exactly do you propose that \noBreak should be placed? With 2.13.47 (sorry, old version), putting

Re: Issue 1553 in lilypond: Staff stretching problem in 2.13.50+

2011-03-09 Thread lilypond
Comment #1 on issue 1553 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: Staff stretching problem in 2.13.50+ http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1553 2.12.3 also tries to make the spacing similar on successive lines. The newer versions just to a better job of it. \relative c'' {

Re: Staff Stretching problem in 2.13.50+

2011-03-09 Thread Keith OHara
James Lowe datacore.com> writes: > > \header { > title = "S C H E R Z O" > } > > \relative c'' { > \time 3/8 > \compressFullBarRests > R1*19*3/8 \break| cis4. | d8 r r | R1*2*3/8 | cis4. | d8 r r | \break > R1*20*3/8 > } > > There is no \markup. > I meant markup in the general sense of t

Re: Staff Stretching problem in 2.13.50+

2011-03-09 Thread Colin Campbell
On 11-03-09 05:52 AM, Graham Percival wrote: \version "2.13.53" \header { % removing the title changes the spacing of the c1 c c c line below! title = "title" } \relative c'' { \compressFullBarRests R1*4 \break % this will either be spaced on two systems (including the title)

Issue 1553 in lilypond: Staff stretching problem in 2.13.50+

2011-03-09 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Critical New issue 1553 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Staff stretching problem in 2.13.50+ http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1553 It seems that any markup on the page causes version 2.13.50+ to prefer stretching the lines

Re: Staff Stretching problem in 2.13.50+

2011-03-09 Thread Graham Percival
On 3/9/11, James Lowe wrote: > Actually if you go back to my example that I reported this with > > \header { > title = "S C H E R Z O" > } > > \relative c'' { > \time 3/8 > \compressFullBarRests > R1*19*3/8 \break| cis4. | d8 r r | R1*2*3/8 | cis4. | d8 r r | \break > R1*20*3/8 > } In which

Re: Staff Stretching problem in 2.13.50+

2011-03-09 Thread James Lowe
Keith, -Original Message- From: Keith OHara Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 08:18:17 + To: bug-lilypond Subject: Re: Staff Stretching problem in 2.13.50+ >> It seems that any markup on the page causes version 2.13.50+ to prefer >> stretching the lines, if one line was forced to

Re: Staff Stretching problem in 2.13.50+

2011-03-09 Thread Keith OHara
> It seems that any markup on the page causes version 2.13.50+ to prefer > stretching the lines, if one line was forced to be stretched. > --- > \version "2.13.51" > \score {\relative c'' { > c1 c \break > d1 d d d d d d d > } } > \markup "hello" > [...] > I think this is a bug/regression. > Prob

Staff Stretching problem in 2.13.50+

2011-03-08 Thread James Lowe
Hello, See attached PNGs >From Keith O'Hara: --- It seems that any markup on the page causes version 2.13.50+ to prefer stretching the lines, if one line was forced to be stretched. \version "2.13.51" \score {\relative c'' { c1 c \break d1 d d d d d d d } } \markup "hello" If the first line ha