> It wasn't the wrong conclusion; there is definitely a problem with
> version 2.12.3. But unfortunately we are not maintaining that
> one; please wait for 2.14 to be ready (hopefully in 3-4 weeks).
I see.
I wait to 2.14 come out in hope.
Good luck in 2.14!
Regards,
Funaji
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 08:00:43PM +, Shotaro Funaji wrote:
> > That's also Graham's opinion since he states this report on the tracker as
> invalid:
> > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1498
>
> I was overlooking notice of guidelines.
> And I have just understood the meanin
> That's also Graham's opinion since he states this report on the tracker as
invalid:
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1498
I have added the tracker by mistake.
I was overlooking notice of guidelines.
And I have just understood the meaning of comment from Mr.Graham.
I am so so
On 2 February 2011 16:19, James Lowe wrote:
>
> Im using 2.13.45.
>
> Looks ok to me unless I am missing something.
>
> See attached.
That's also Graham's opinion since he states this report on the tracker
as invalid:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1498
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xa
I confirm that those accidentals are laid properly on version 2.13.47.
Sorry for the trouble.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
-Original Message-
From: bug-lilypond-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
[mailto:bug-lilypond-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
Shotaro Funaji
Sent: 02 February 2011 13:17
To: bug-lilypond@gnu.org
Subject: Some accidentals are not printed properly
% Accidentals crash into notes.
% These spaces are the same as when without accidentals.
% They are too narrow.
\version "2.12.3"
{
\set Staff.extraNatural = ##f
<<
{ r8 r16 geses''
r8 r16 ges''
r8 r16 gisis''
r8 r16
