Op zaterdag 31-10-2009 om 18:42 uur [tijdzone +], schreef Graham
Percival:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 03:46:00PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> >> Maybe we could try bumping Freetype and Fontconfig to the latest
>libtool: compi
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 11:03:55AM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>
>> Apparently, that Pango bug was fixed in 1.24.1, so maybe it's a
>> regression? I'll test on Leopard in a second.
>
> We currently use pango 1.24.4, which was released on
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 11:03:55AM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
> > At long last, though I present 2.13.7 for darwin-x86, made with
> > freetype 2.3.11 and fontconfig 2.7.3.
>
> Great! That fixed font caching problem on Snow Leopard (fo
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 03:16:56PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>> Umm, I suggested that Fontconfig be updated, not Fontforge. It seems
>> that the Snow Leopard problem stems from what happens after
>> FcConfigBuildFonts() is called, and t
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 03:16:56PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> Umm, I suggested that Fontconfig be updated, not Fontforge. It seems
> that the Snow Leopard problem stems from what happens after
> FcConfigBuildFonts() is called, and this is part of Fontconfig.
Hah! Not only did I spend an hou
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 03:46:00PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>>> Maybe we could try bumping Freetype and Fontconfig to the latest
>>> releases? IIRC, GUB is using an old ve
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 03:46:00PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>> Maybe we could try bumping Freetype and Fontconfig to the latest
>> releases? IIRC, GUB is using an old version of Freetype.
>
> This'll be more complicated than I origina
On 2009-10-30, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 03:46:00PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> > On 2009-10-28, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> > > Would it be possible to build an installer from the release/2.12.2
> > > commit in stable/2.12?
> >
> > Maybe we could try bumping Freetype and F
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 03:46:00PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On 2009-10-28, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> > Would it be possible to build an installer from the release/2.12.2
> > commit in stable/2.12?
>
> Maybe we could try bumping Freetype and Fontconfig to the latest
> releases? IIRC, GUB is
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 03:46:00PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On 2009-10-28, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> > On 2009-10-28, Graham Percival wrote:
> > > Didn't we find that the 2.12.3 pre-release failed as well? If I'm
> > > remembering correctly, then the problem would either be in GUB3 or
> > >
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:12:47AM +1100, Peter Leschev wrote:
>I'm happy to try 2.12.3 pre-release - is it publicly
>available? Can't find it here:
>http://download.linuxaudio.org/lilypond/binaries/darwin-x86/
Since it's a pre-release, no, it's not available there. Wh
On 2009-10-28, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On 2009-10-28, Graham Percival wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 03:28:45PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> > > At this point, we can only speculate about the reasons why 2.12.2
> > > works but 2.13.6 does not, because 2.12.2 was built with GUB2 (no
> > > lo
On 2009-10-28, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 03:28:45PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> > At this point, we can only speculate about the reasons why 2.12.2
> > works but 2.13.6 does not, because 2.12.2 was built with GUB2 (no
> > longer exists) and 2.13.6 was built with GUB3.
>
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 03:28:45PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> At this point, we can only speculate about the reasons why 2.12.2
> works but 2.13.6 does not, because 2.12.2 was built with GUB2 (no
> longer exists) and 2.13.6 was built with GUB3.
Didn't we find that the 2.12.3 pre-release faile
On 2009-10-28, Peter Leschev wrote:
>
> I noticed a few mails saying that lilypond does not run
> using Snow Leopard. On a fresh machine, I installed 2.13.6
> and experienced the endless loop while constructing the
> font list. I removed this version & installed 2.12.2 and
> it ran successfully
T
Hi,
I noticed a few mails saying that lilypond does not run using Snow
Leopard. On a fresh machine, I installed 2.13.6 and experienced the endless loop
while constructing the font list. I removed this version & installed 2.12.2 and
it ran successfully
Cheers,
Peter
__
16 matches
Mail list logo
