Re: Rehearsal mark positionning

2009-10-29 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Neil Puttock wrote: > No, I'm sure you're right here, which means there's a problem with > disabling the after-line-breaking callback, especially in the case of > tall Score objects. Greetings, I'm not sure how to write a bug report for this: I can't understand t

Re: Rehearsal mark positionning

2009-09-13 Thread Neil Puttock
2009/9/13 Reinhold Kainhofer : > But the problem was that without moving to the top staff, these grobs are not > accounted for in the vertical layout, thus leading to collisions, etc. Or am I > misremembering something here? No, I'm sure you're right here, which means there's a problem with disab

Re: Rehearsal mark positionning

2009-09-13 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Sonntag, 13. September 2009 18:54:20 schrieb Neil Puttock: > 2009/9/13 Nicolas Sceaux : > > %% In the following snippet, the Mark_engraver being in the Score > > context, %% the rehearsal mark shall be placed at the bottom of the > > system, not at

Re: Rehearsal mark positionning

2009-09-13 Thread Neil Puttock
2009/9/13 Nicolas Sceaux : > %% In the following snippet, the Mark_engraver being in the Score context, > %% the rehearsal mark shall be placed at the bottom of the system, not at > %% the bottom of first staff. \once \override Score.RehearsalMark #'after-line-breaking = ##t I think there was a

Rehearsal mark positionning

2009-09-13 Thread Nicolas Sceaux
Hi, [git from Sat Sep 12 21:00:03 2009] %% In the following snippet, the Mark_engraver being in the Score context, %% the rehearsal mark shall be placed at the bottom of the system, not at %% the bottom of first staff. \version "2.13.4" \new StaffGroup << \new Staff { g'1 g' } \new St