Re: Regtest compiling

2010-12-02 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 06:28:28PM +0100, James Bailey wrote: > > On Nov 30, 2010, at 7:47 AM, Graham Percival wrote: > > > cd input/regression/ > > for f in *.ly; do lilypond $f; done; > > True, but like I said, I'm trying to come as close as possible > to mimicking the actual user experience o

Re: Regtest compiling

2010-12-01 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 07:34:04AM +0100, James Bailey wrote: > > 1. Is there any reason I should install this if I can already compile > lilypond on my computer without lilybuntu? If you can already compile lilypond, and are confident that it's compiling correctly, you have no weird ghostscript

Re: Regtest compiling

2010-12-01 Thread James Bailey
On Nov 30, 2010, at 7:47 AM, Graham Percival wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 07:34:04AM +0100, James Bailey wrote: > >> 3. How do tracking memory usage and source code changes get me any closer to >> easily compiling the regtests? I'm guessing they probably don't. > > Sorry, I don't understan

Regtest compiling

2010-12-01 Thread James Bailey
On Nov 30, 2010, at 6:07 AM, Graham Percival wrote: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 06:26:04PM +0100, James Bailey wrote: >> If anyone has any tips on how to compile them easily, I'd be >> more than willing to listen. > > 1. install lilybuntu. Link+explanations in the CG. > 2. compile lilypond. CG 3