Jean Abou Samra writes:
>How strange. I'm darn sure it was attached, I even recall the icon
>
>in my message... Hope it works this time !
Your mail client tends to make messages somewhat peculiar, but the patch
attachment was present. I'll take a look at it: basically I think it is
a bi
Le 4 mars 2020 à 21:53, David Kastrup < [1]d...@gnu.org> a écrit :
Since you did not just send to the list but also sent a private copy to
my mail account, I am pretty sure that the patch never attached itself.
We've had various occurences of patches not making it through the list
Jean Abou Samra writes:
> Hi,
>
> Le 3 mars 2020 à 20:58, David Kastrup < d...@gnu.org> a écrit :
>
> Well, the less reason for quibbling (which I myself tend to indulge in
> more than appropriate) ends up on our list and the less confusion ends
> up with our users, the friendlier LilyPon
Hi,
Le 3 mars 2020 à 20:58, David Kastrup < [1]d...@gnu.org> a écrit :
Well, the less reason for quibbling (which I myself tend to indulge in
more than appropriate) ends up on our list and the less confusion ends
up with our users, the friendlier LilyPond will appear to everyone.
Jean Abou Samra writes:
>> Wrong. \change does not work to change a Staff from Staff to Staff, and
>> at the point of your first \change command, you do not yet have a Voice
>> (the temporary voices started in << \\ >> have just ended).
>
>> So the solution is to actually start a voice.
>
>> and
> Wrong. \change does not work to change a Staff from Staff to Staff, and
> at the point of your first \change command, you do not yet have a Voice
> (the temporary voices started in << \\ >> have just ended).
> So the solution is to actually start a voice.
> and you'll actually _have_ a Voice t
Jean Abou Samra writes:
>Hi again,
>
>In this example, LilyPond complains and \change has no effect. However,
>if you move the \change between the second and the third measure (i.e.
>one line lower), then all is fine. So, it seems that \change does not
>work right after the en
