Hi Carl,
Have not tried that idea.
The weird thing is that it's only dynamics that are affected. I thought it
might be some subtle font caching issue with the font I use, but I reverted
to lilypond default and the same occurs. Once the dynamic finally makes
itself visible, it stays.
This may rem
Have you tried changing the lilypond call in Frescobaldi to a gdb lilypond
call, so that you can pause the execution of lilypond and give Frescobaldi time
to do whatever it might do -- and then continue lilypond from the debugger?
Have you tried changing the Frescobaldi options for displaying th
Hi k\Kevin and All,
It ranks as one of the most bizarre bugs I have ever seen (and I speak as a
software developer of many decades). It's only with Frescobaldi. Command
line compilation is fine. It's only dynamic markings, which is puzzling -
whatever is going on? Running sync of course I tried, t
> Didn't seem to help unfortunately. So far it really seems that LilyPond
> behaves inconsistently in this case when run as a subprocess of Frescobaldi.
How bizarre. I wonder what difference there could possibly be that
would make files appear to have different content. Does this issue
occur in Fr
Am 12.11.18 um 22:15 schrieb Graham King:
On 9 Nov 2018, at 14:07, Andrew Bernard wrote:
I do not know
how to get the lilypond command for compiling out of Frescobaldi to examine.
...but you might be able to get it out of the process table by using the Linux command
"ps" with a suitable fla
On 9 Nov 2018, at 14:07, Andrew Bernard wrote:
> I do not know
> how to get the lilypond command for compiling out of Frescobaldi to examine.
...but you might be able to get it out of the process table by using the Linux
command "ps" with a suitable flag (see "man ps" on your distro). This ne
Am 9. November 2018 15:07:41 MEZ schrieb Andrew Bernard
:
>Hi Urs,
>
>Installed Debian 9.5 and all. The error, I am sorry to say, is in
>Frescobaldi, displayed in Ubuntu 18.10 and Debian 9.5. Using emacs and
>command line lilypond works fine on both Linux distros. Using
>Frescobaldi
>3.0.0, the
Hi Urs,
Installed Debian 9.5 and all. The error, I am sorry to say, is in
Frescobaldi, displayed in Ubuntu 18.10 and Debian 9.5. Using emacs and
command line lilypond works fine on both Linux distros. Using Frescobaldi
3.0.0, the dynamics appear only intermittently, with no apparent pattern.
I am
Am 9. November 2018 08:00:08 MEZ schrieb Andrew Bernard
:
>OK. Using a command line compile there is no sign of this issue.
>
>At least I can continue with the engraving.
>
>This looks not to be a lilypond bug now but an interaction between
>Frescobaldi and Ubuntu 18.10.
>
>In which case it loo
OK. Using a command line compile there is no sign of this issue.
At least I can continue with the engraving.
This looks not to be a lilypond bug now but an interaction between
Frescobaldi and Ubuntu 18.10.
In which case it looks like I have to abandon Frescobaldi after all these
years. Not good!
Am 9. November 2018 07:51:05 MEZ schrieb Andrew Bernard
:
>Hi Urs,
>
>Thanks for the tip. It just happened with the first dynamic I added on
>about page seven. Everything fine until then.
>
>Having worked as a UNIX professional developer for a very long time, I
>can
>tell you something equally
Hi Urs,
Thanks for the tip. It just happened with the first dynamic I added on
about page seven. Everything fine until then.
Having worked as a UNIX professional developer for a very long time, I can
tell you something equally lunatic sounding. It has a whiff of being
related to file system buffe
Am 9. November 2018 02:46:25 MEZ schrieb Andrew Bernard
:
>Hi All,
>
>I apologize for the seeming lunacy of this post! I am using lilypond
>2.19.82 on Ubuntu 18.10. I am currently engraving a string quarter.
>Only
>seven or eight pages in, I have started added in the dynamics and I
>find
>they
13 matches
Mail list logo
