[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Curious - I suspect that the problem is caused by TeX's \vrule (which
> > are only used for staff lines) in combination with improper scaling
> > somewhere. Stay tuned.
>
> Or dvips -- didn't we have see dvips subtle alignment problems with
> stems and beams?
Yes, th
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> Curious - I suspect that the problem is caused by TeX's \vrule (which
> are only used for staff lines) in combination with improper scaling
> somewhere. Stay tuned.
Or dvips -- didn't we have see dvips subtle alignment problems with
stems and beams?
--
Jan Nieuwenhuiz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The ps file was made in four steps:
> 1. lilypond
> 2. dvips -E to get an EPS file
> 3. included the eps file in a latex doc.
> 4. dvips
>
> I looked closer at the issue, comparin a printing with my printer and the
> imageset version.
> All the objects are exactly as on
The ps file was made in four steps:
1. lilypond
2. dvips -E to get an EPS file
3. included the eps file in a latex doc.
4. dvips
I looked closer at the issue, comparin a printing with my printer and the
imageset version.
All the objects are exactly as on the simple printed version, including all
b
For me it appears that the width of the staff line that is printed after the
barline is almost exactly 1/72 inch.
Perhaps this helps.
Greetings,
Bert
___
Bug-lilypond mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
