On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> "Graham Percival" wrote in message
> news:20110122145258.GA17491@futoi...
>
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 01:24:26PM +, James Lowe wrote:
>>
>>> There seems to be an inconsistency with setting horizontal beams.
>>> \override Beam #'damping
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Low Frog
New issue 1493 by ralphbug...@gmail.com: Problem with horizontal beams
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1493
James Lowe :
There seems to be an inconsistency with setting horizontal beams.
We have a
"Graham Percival" wrote in message
news:20110122145258.GA17491@futoi...
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 01:24:26PM +, James Lowe wrote:
There seems to be an inconsistency with setting horizontal beams.
\override Beam #'damping = #+inf.0
IIRC, this is a hack rather than an "officially supported" t
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 01:24:26PM +, James Lowe wrote:
> There seems to be an inconsistency with setting horizontal beams.
> \override Beam #'damping = #+inf.0
IIRC, this is a hack rather than an "officially supported" thing
(whatever that might mean).
> We have a snippet where we state that
Hello,
There seems to be an inconsistency with setting horizontal beams.
We have a snippet where we state that
\override Beam #'damping = #+inf.0
Should generate horizontal beams in all cases.
However the simple example attached shows some odd inconsistencies.
All the notes are identical per
