2011/9/17 Reinhold Kainhofer :
> Am Saturday, 17. September 2011, 15:29:45 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
>> >> I added the variable definition pf = #(make-dynamic-script "pf") to
>> >> my ly source, but is there any reason why this should not be added
>> >> to dynamic-scripts-init.ly? That already conta
Am Saturday, 17. September 2011, 15:29:45 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
> >> I added the variable definition pf = #(make-dynamic-script "pf") to
> >> my ly source, but is there any reason why this should not be added
> >> to dynamic-scripts-init.ly? That already contains fp as a dynamic
> >> marking, wh
>> I added the variable definition pf = #(make-dynamic-script "pf") to
>> my ly source, but is there any reason why this should not be added
>> to dynamic-scripts-init.ly? That already contains fp as a dynamic
>> marking, why not pf?
>
> I don't see why it couldn't contain more permutations of '
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Nick Payne wrote:
> I've been setting some Carcassi studies. His Op60 No 8 has a "pf" dynamic
> marking at one point (see
> http://erato.uvt.nl/files/imglnks/usimg/c/c8/IMSLP34430-PMLP03629-ribs0980_06.pdf,
> fifth stave on the first page), which does not e
I've been setting some Carcassi studies. His Op60 No 8 has a "pf"
dynamic marking at one point (see
http://erato.uvt.nl/files/imglnks/usimg/c/c8/IMSLP34430-PMLP03629-ribs0980_06.pdf,
fifth stave on the first page), which does not exist in Lilypond. I
added the variable definition pf = #(make-dy
