On 09/09/13 23:08, Mark Polesky wrote:
So, how exactly do I get all the New Century Schoolbook
fonts in one go? I could download all the typefaces
separately, but I won't know when I've gotten them all.
I did
sudo apt-get build-dep lilypond
and it claimed to install something, but I don't
So, how exactly do I get all the New Century Schoolbook
fonts in one go? I could download all the typefaces
separately, but I won't know when I've gotten them all.
I did
sudo apt-get build-dep lilypond
and it claimed to install something, but I don't recall
what. Then I rebooted and checked
On 29/08/2013 12:35 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Here's my make.log:
http://www.markpolesky.com/norobots/make.log
Indeed: Instead of calling the script pfx2ttf.fontforge four times, I
just see
true
true
true
true
The rule covering this can be found in file `mf/GNUmakefile':
$(
> Here's my make.log:
>
> http://www.markpolesky.com/norobots/make.log
Indeed: Instead of calling the script pfx2ttf.fontforge four times, I
just see
true
true
true
true
The rule covering this can be found in file `mf/GNUmakefile':
$(NCSB_OTFS): $(NCSB_SOURCE_FILES) \
"Mark Polesky" wrote in message
news:1377680573.29275.yahoomail...@web181405.mail.ne1.yahoo.com...
Werner Lemberg wrote:
Can you show us the lines in your `make.log' file directly
after the calls to the `pfx2ttf.fontforge' script? Maybe
there is some hint which shows what's going on.
Curiousl
David Kastrup wrote:
>> make all &> make.log
>>
>> Am I using the wrong redirection operator?
>
> Depends on your shell. Bash understands both &> and >&.
Well, I'm using bash. This just gets weirder and weirder.
Here's my make.log:
http://www.markpolesky.com/norobots/make.log
___
Mark Polesky writes:
> Werner Lemberg wrote:
>> Can you show us the lines in your `make.log' file directly
>> after the calls to the `pfx2ttf.fontforge' script? Maybe
>> there is some hint which shows what's going on.
>
> Curiously, no. There is no call to that function in my
> make.log file.
Werner Lemberg wrote:
> Can you show us the lines in your `make.log' file directly
> after the calls to the `pfx2ttf.fontforge' script? Maybe
> there is some hint which shows what's going on.
Curiously, no. There is no call to that function in my
make.log file. I did:
make all &> make.log
Am
> are you implying that you might know how to fix this?
Not really. Actually, I hope that some of our make gurus chime in :-)
Can you show us the lines in your `make.log' file directly after the
calls to the `pfx2ttf.fontforge' script? Maybe there is some hint
which shows what's going on.
Werner Lemberg wrote:
> Note that there seems to be a bug somewhere regarding
> dependencies: Doing a non-parallel build, the above
> command is run four times. Maybe this is the very reasons
> of your problem.
Werner,
are you implying that you might know how to fix this? Or
should I instead as
[git cc2b7846]
> No such file or directory: './out/CenturySchL-Ital.otf'
Obviously, this means that FontForge hasn't created this file while
doing `make'.
The Century OTFs are created by the script `pfx2ttf.fontforge'. For
my local compilation, I see the following command while doing `make
all
Phil Holmes wrote:
> I'm fairly certain the -j/CPU_COUNT is irrelevant. Use an
> appropriate value for your machine. I asked earlier what
> happens if you try a simple compilation of some music with
> lyrics on your built LilyPond. Could you try, please?
Actually I hadn't run `make install' pre
"Mark Polesky" wrote in message
news:1377636118.24933.yahoomail...@web181402.mail.ne1.yahoo.com...
Mark Polesky wrote:
checking New Century Schoolbook PFB files... dirname:
missing operand Try `dirname --help' for more information.
I don't know what that means, but it doesn't raise an
error. I
Mark Polesky wrote:
> checking New Century Schoolbook PFB files... dirname:
> missing operand Try `dirname --help' for more information.
>
> I don't know what that means, but it doesn't raise an
> error. I'm going ahead with a full make/make doc, which
> takes just under 2hrs on my system when I
Mark Polesky writes:
> Colin Campbell wrote:
>> Another possibility is that your font cache is munged
>
> Okay, I moved the .lilypond-fonts.cache-2/ directory out of
> my home directory, and configure responds with:
>
> checking New Century Schoolbook PFB files... dirname: missing operand
> Try
Colin Campbell wrote:
> Another possibility is that your font cache is munged
Okay, I moved the .lilypond-fonts.cache-2/ directory out of
my home directory, and configure responds with:
checking New Century Schoolbook PFB files... dirname: missing operand
Try `dirname --help' for more informatio
On 13-08-27 09:16 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
"Mark Polesky" wrote in message
news:1377597745.14398.yahoomail...@web181404.mail.ne1.yahoo.com...
In case anyone is still interested in this, today I
completely cleaned out my source dir and did a `make' and
`make doc' (no `-j5' or `CPU_COUNT=5'), from
"Mark Polesky" wrote in message
news:1377597745.14398.yahoomail...@web181404.mail.ne1.yahoo.com...
In case anyone is still interested in this, today I
completely cleaned out my source dir and did a `make' and
`make doc' (no `-j5' or `CPU_COUNT=5'), from scratch with
latest master:
rm -rf ~/lily
Hello,
On 27/08/13 11:02, Mark Polesky wrote:
In case anyone is still interested in this, today I
completely cleaned out my source dir and did a `make' and
`make doc' (no `-j5' or `CPU_COUNT=5'), from scratch with
latest master:
rm -rf ~/lilypond-git/* && git reset --hard origin/master
./autoge
2013/8/27 Mark Polesky :
> In case anyone is still interested in this, today I
> completely cleaned out my source dir and did a `make' and
> `make doc' (no `-j5' or `CPU_COUNT=5'), from scratch with
> latest master:
>
> rm -rf ~/lilypond-git/* && git reset --hard origin/master
> ./autogen.sh --noco
In case anyone is still interested in this, today I
completely cleaned out my source dir and did a `make' and
`make doc' (no `-j5' or `CPU_COUNT=5'), from scratch with
latest master:
rm -rf ~/lilypond-git/* && git reset --hard origin/master
./autogen.sh --noconfigure
mkdir build/
cd build/
../conf
"Mark Polesky" wrote in message
news:1377479265.2132.yahoomail...@web181406.mail.ne1.yahoo.com...
As time permits, I may try to compile some old releases to
see if I can pinpoint the release where the problem emerges,
if not the commit itself. This could take a while! In the
meantime, I presume
"Mark Polesky" wrote in message
news:1377498407.12550.yahoomail...@web181406.mail.ne1.yahoo.com...
Colin Campbell wrote:
When I compile, I generally use -j3 CPU_COUNT=3 on a
dual-core machine, with no font issues that I've seen.
I have a quad-core; so I've been using -j5 CPU_COUNT=5.
- Mark
Colin Campbell wrote:
> When I compile, I generally use -j3 CPU_COUNT=3 on a
> dual-core machine, with no font issues that I've seen.
I have a quad-core; so I've been using -j5 CPU_COUNT=5.
- Mark
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http
On 13-08-25 07:07 PM, Mark Polesky wrote:
David Kastrup wrote:
As I mentioned earlier, my font problem only happens on
2.17.25. The output on 2.17.24 is fine.
There is no real candidate for such a difference in the
commits. So did you choose a significantly different
directory name for buildi
David Kastrup wrote:
>> As I mentioned earlier, my font problem only happens on
>> 2.17.25. The output on 2.17.24 is fine.
>
> There is no real candidate for such a difference in the
> commits. So did you choose a significantly different
> directory name for building 2.17.25?
No. I haven't bui
Mark Polesky writes:
> Colin Campbell wrote:
>> To be accurate, I tested on 2.17.24 so I'm just now
>> remaking doc after updating to latest master and
>> recompiling the binaries.
>
> As I mentioned earlier, my font problem only happens on
> 2.17.25. The output on 2.17.24 is fine.
There is n
On 13-08-25 04:11 PM, Mark Polesky wrote:
Colin Campbell wrote:
To be accurate, I tested on 2.17.24 so I'm just now
remaking doc after updating to latest master and
recompiling the binaries.
As I mentioned earlier, my font problem only happens on
2.17.25. The output on 2.17.24 is fine.
- Mark
Colin Campbell wrote:
> To be accurate, I tested on 2.17.24 so I'm just now
> remaking doc after updating to latest master and
> recompiling the binaries.
As I mentioned earlier, my font problem only happens on
2.17.25. The output on 2.17.24 is fine.
- Mark
___
Phil Holmes wrote:
> OK. You're definitely attaching cropped screenshots,
> AFAICS.
Yes.
> Compare the first one you attached, where the heading
> "Using \lyriscto" is sans serif, with the one you've just
> attached. That's a serif font.
Exactly. In the first one, I set my browser's default
On 13-08-25 03:35 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
"Mark Polesky" wrote in message
news:1377464714.23076.yahoomail...@web181406.mail.ne1.yahoo.com...
forgot the attachment
___
"Mark Polesky" wrote in message
news:1377464714.23076.yahoomail...@web181406.mail.ne1.yahoo.com...
forgot the attachment
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@g
Colin Campbell wrote:
> Looks as though the problem is local, Mark.
I'm willing to accept that as a possibility, but how would I
begin to troubleshoot it? How could I sort out the cause?
Besides, if that's true, what if this happens to other users
(and ones less advanced than I), what do we te
Phil Holmes wrote:
> Huh? The rest of the fonts on what looks like your
> screenshot from a browser are also sans-serif. Huh? It's
> looks like a problem with your system. As I said, I can't
> reproduce it on my system from git master.
Okay, Phil, sorry if I got snippy. But there's a
misund
forgot the attachment<>___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
On 13-08-25 02:04 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
"Mark Polesky" wrote in message
news:1377458947.49434.yahoomail...@web181402.mail.ne1.yahoo.com...
Phil Holmes wrote:
I think this must be something to do with your own system
- don't forget that for HTML, the font is actually chosen
by the browser. Her
"Mark Polesky" wrote in message
news:1377458947.49434.yahoomail...@web181402.mail.ne1.yahoo.com...
Phil Holmes wrote:
I think this must be something to do with your own system
- don't forget that for HTML, the font is actually chosen
by the browser. Here's latest master, make doc on 64 bit
Ubun
Phil Holmes wrote:
> I think this must be something to do with your own system
> - don't forget that for HTML, the font is actually chosen
> by the browser. Here's latest master, make doc on 64 bit
> Ubuntu 10.04.
Huh? The font problem is showing in the png images produced
from `make doc', not
"Mark Polesky" wrote in message
news:1377399836.87571.yahoomail...@web181404.mail.ne1.yahoo.com...
Hi, maybe this has been discussed and I missed it, but I
compiled the docs today, and all the lyrics came out in
"sans". Is this a known issue?
$ uname -a
Linux localhost 3.2.0-36-generic #57-Ub
James wrote:
> Using 32 bit lilydev I don't get this problem. It all
> looks 'normal' from building from today's tree.
Okay good, that should help developers narrow down this bug.
Thomas Morley wrote:
> Compiling
>
> [...]
>
> with 2.17.24 (via installer) on
> Linux kasten 2.6.32-50-generic #1
Thomas,
On 25 August 2013 13:35, Thomas Morley wrote:
> 2013/8/25 James :
> > Mark,
> >
> >
> > On 25 August 2013 04:03, Mark Polesky wrote:
> >
> >> Hi, maybe this has been discussed and I missed it, but I
> >> compiled the docs today, and all the lyrics came out in
> >> "sans". Is this a kn
2013/8/25 James :
> Mark,
>
>
> On 25 August 2013 04:03, Mark Polesky wrote:
>
>> Hi, maybe this has been discussed and I missed it, but I
>> compiled the docs today, and all the lyrics came out in
>> "sans". Is this a known issue?
>>
>> $ uname -a
>> Linux localhost 3.2.0-36-generic #57-Ubuntu S
Mark,
On 25 August 2013 04:03, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Hi, maybe this has been discussed and I missed it, but I
> compiled the docs today, and all the lyrics came out in
> "sans". Is this a known issue?
>
> $ uname -a
> Linux localhost 3.2.0-36-generic #57-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jan 8
> 21:44:52 UTC 201
Hi, maybe this has been discussed and I missed it, but I
compiled the docs today, and all the lyrics came out in
"sans". Is this a known issue?
$ uname -a
Linux localhost 3.2.0-36-generic #57-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jan 8
21:44:52 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
- Mark
<>_
44 matches
Mail list logo
