Re: Issue 963 in lilypond: check dependency versions for 2.14

2010-05-28 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Verified Comment #14 on issue 963 by percival.music.ca: check dependency versions for 2.14 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963 I haven't heard any screams from packagers yet, so let's called this done. _

Re: Issue 963 in lilypond: check dependency versions for 2.14

2010-05-09 Thread lilypond
Comment #13 on issue 963 by percival.music.ca: check dependency versions for 2.14 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963 GUB has built most of the architectures (it's on linux-pcc right now); if these were going to cause problems, it would have happened by now. For the reco

Re: Issue 963 in lilypond: check dependency versions for 2.14

2010-05-09 Thread lilypond
Comment #12 on issue 963 by v.villenave: check dependency versions for 2.14 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963 This may not be the most appropriate place to discuss that, but do we still want to ship Python 2.4 with the mingw LilyPond build? (I personally don't care what v

Re: Issue 963 in lilypond: check dependency versions for 2.14

2010-05-08 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: fixed_2_13_21 Comment #11 on issue 963 by pnorcks: check dependency versions for 2.14 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963 Okay, I've finished checking the libraries. I only bumped two of the minimum versions: Fontconfig: 2.4.

Re: Issue 963 in lilypond: check dependency versions for 2.14

2010-05-06 Thread lilypond
Comment #10 on issue 963 by pnorcks: check dependency versions for 2.14 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963 This is my plan: I will be checking the APIs for 1) Pango 2) Fontconfig 3) Freetype to make sure we are not using functions in these libraries that break the minimu

Re: Issue 963 in lilypond: check dependency versions for 2.14

2010-04-19 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Started Comment #9 on issue 963 by pnorcks: check dependency versions for 2.14 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963 For sure, we're not bumping Guile or Python, but I'll begin checking everything else that has minimum version requirements. -- You re

Re: Issue 963 in lilypond: check dependency versions for 2.14

2010-04-14 Thread lilypond
Updates: Summary: check dependency versions for 2.14 Comment #8 on issue 963 by percival.music.ca: check dependency versions for 2.14 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963 I want somebody to tell me that we don't want to update any libraries [any more] for 2.14. Th

Re: Issue 963 in lilypond: check dependency versions

2010-04-13 Thread lilypond
Comment #7 on issue 963 by Carl.D.Sorensen: check dependency versions http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963 It seems to me that with 2.16, rather than 2.14, now being the target for guile 2.0, this should no longer be marked Critical (unless there are other libraries we want t

Re: Issue 963 in lilypond: check dependency versions

2010-02-22 Thread lilypond
Comment #6 on issue 963 by percival.music.ca: check dependency versions http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963 No it wouldn't -- then people wouldn't be able to take advantage of it without spending hours rewriting their scores. 2.16 will use guile 2.0 (unless it's delayed be

Re: Issue 963 in lilypond: check dependency versions

2010-02-22 Thread lilypond
Comment #5 on issue 963 by v.villenave: check dependency versions http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963 IWBN if we could make the guile 2.0 upgrade coincide with our next major version bump (aka Lily 3.0), wouldn't it? -- You received this message because you are listed in t

Re: Issue 963 in lilypond: check dependency versions

2010-02-21 Thread lilypond
Comment #4 on issue 963 by hanwenn: check dependency versions http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963 I suspect it is will be painful to support both 1.8 and 2.0; I think the smart plan is to wait for 2.0 to come out , and then try to upgrade lily to guile 2.0 fully, throwing a

Re: Issue 963 in lilypond: check dependency versions

2010-02-21 Thread lilypond
Comment #3 on issue 963 by pnorcks: check dependency versions http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963 Sure, I'll look into it. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue

Re: Issue 963 in lilypond: check dependency versions

2010-02-20 Thread lilypond
Updates: Owner: pnorcks Comment #2 on issue 963 by percival.music.ca: check dependency versions http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963 Let's not wait for guile 2.0. Even if it comes out tomorrow, we should probably give it a few months to find+resolve any major bugs.

Re: Issue 963 in lilypond: check dependency versions

2010-01-09 Thread lilypond
Comment #1 on issue 963 by pnorcks: check dependency versions http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963 Guile 2.0 will be coming out relatively soon, and it's unclear to me whether we will be able to support Guile 1.8 or earlier due to major incompatibilities with Guile 1.8. W

Issue 963 in lilypond: check dependency versions

2010-01-09 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Build Priority-Critical New issue 963 by percival.music.ca: check dependency versions http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963 Before 2.14, but fairly close to the release, we should check the versions of libraries and stuff we use. I'm th