Updates:
Status: Verified
Comment #8 on issue 907 by v.villenave: EasyHeads collide with accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=907
Neat! Thanks, verified.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you
Comment #7 on issue 907 by pnorcks: EasyHeads collide with accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=907
I added one a few days ago. See
input/regression/easy-notation-accidentals.ly
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this i
Updates:
Labels: regtest
Comment #6 on issue 907 by v.villenave: EasyHeads collide with accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=907
Either way, I'll mark it as Verified as soon as we have a regtest.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
Comment #5 on issue 907 by percival.music.ca: EasyHeads collide with
accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=907
I disagree; we usually modify regtests whenever it seems reasonable. Since
the
regtests are mainly intended to check unintentional changes, and we know
Comment #4 on issue 907 by n.puttock: EasyHeads collide with accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=907
I think a separate test is preferable, otherwise the MD5 hash will change,
preventing
comparisons with earlier versions.
--
You received this message because you ar
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: fixed_2_13_9
Comment #3 on issue 907 by pnorcks: EasyHeads collide with accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=907
Does this need a separate regression test? Or would it be worth adding a
couple of
notes (with accidentals
Comment #2 on issue 907 by pnorcks: EasyHeads collide with accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=907
The precise commit is 340184bb817e76fe6d13edfd015abb4f9476f02c.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because y
Comment #1 on issue 907 by pnorcks: EasyHeads collide with accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=907
The regression was introduced between 2.13.0 and 2.13.1.
There were some commits related to accidental (placement) between these two
versions.
I'm looking into it.
Status: Accepted
Owner: v.villenave
Labels: Type-Collision Priority-Regression
New issue 907 by v.villenave: EasyHeads collide with accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=907
% New report from Martin Tarenskeen:
% This problem seems to have been introduced in the 2.13 se
