Re: Issue 849 in lilypond: Rests should not keep staves alive

2010-09-11 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Verified Comment #6 on issue 849 by v.villenave: Rests should not keep staves alive http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=849 Works like a charm now. Thanks Carl! ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.or

Re: Issue 849 in lilypond: Rests should not keep staves alive

2010-09-08 Thread lilypond
Comment #5 on issue 849 by x.scheuer: Rests should not keep staves alive http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=849 Great! Thank you. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: Issue 849 in lilypond: Rests should not keep staves alive

2010-09-08 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: fixed_2_13_33 Comment #4 on issue 849 by Carl.D.Sorensen: Rests should not keep staves alive http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=849 Fixed in commit 387bf986cfa362ce3f90dcc7f44a7cc0ab602fb1 ___

Re: Issue 849 in lilypond: Rests should not keep staves alive

2010-09-08 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Started Owner: Carl.D.Sorensen Comment #3 on issue 849 by Carl.D.Sorensen: Rests should not keep staves alive http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=849 Yes, this appears to be a trivial change. ___ bug

Re: Issue 849 in lilypond: Rests should not keep staves alive

2010-09-07 Thread lilypond
Comment #2 on issue 849 by x.scheuer: Rests should not keep staves alive http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=849 \RemoveEmptyStaffContext has been reworked recently isn't it? Couldn't a dev start working on this issue thanks to Nicolas' code or Reinhold's instructions? Many thank

Re: Issue 849 in lilypond: Rests should not keep staves alive

2010-01-14 Thread lilypond
Updates: Owner: --- Labels: -Priority-Medium -Engraving-nitpick Priority-Low Comment #1 on issue 849 by percival.music.ca: Rests should not keep staves alive http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=849 (No comment was entered for this change.) Attachments:

Issue 849 in lilypond: Rests should not keep staves alive

2009-10-03 Thread codesite-noreply
Status: Accepted Owner: v.villenave CC: nicolas.sceaux, reinhold.kainhofer Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Engraving-nitpick New issue 849 by v.villenave: Rests should not keep staves alive http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=849 In the following example, the first staff is p