Updates:
Status: Verified
Comment #5 on issue 730 by v.villenave: AccidentalPlacement should
take 'left-padding into account
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=730
(No comment was entered for this change.)
___
bug-lilypond
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #4 on issue 730 by n.puttock: AccidentalPlacement should
take 'left-padding into account
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=730
I've removed it; it had a nasty effect on ambitus (shifting them to the
right if an accidental was present
Comment #3 on issue 730 by joeneeman: AccidentalPlacement should
take 'left-padding into account
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=730
You can restore it if you like (I don't remember why I removed it,
actually). But I'm
not sure that it originally did what this bug report
Comment #2 on issue 730 by n.puttock: AccidentalPlacement should
take 'left-padding into account
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=730
Hi Joe,
When you refactored the accidental placement code, you
removed 'left-padding. Should
it be restored (I see there's a default for
Comment #1 on issue 730 by n.puttock: AccidentalPlacement should
take 'left-padding into account
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=730
I now think this is invalid, since 'left-padding is used to pad items whose
supports
would be accidentals, such as fingerings (see below).
Status: Accepted
Owner: v.villenave
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium
New issue 730 by v.villenave: AccidentalPlacement should take 'left-padding
into account
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=730
Report from Mark:
\version "2.11.64-1"
\relative {
%% right-padding i
