Updates:
Owner: percival.music.ca
Comment #5 on issue 38 by jameseli...@googlemail.com: collision fingering
beam
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=38
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fiel
Updates:
Status: Verified
Owner: ---
Comment #4 on issue 38 by jameseli...@googlemail.com: collision fingering
beam
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=38
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
MAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 5:53 AM
Subject: Re: Issue 38 in lilypond: collision fingering beam
From: Trevor Daniels
I've added a snippet based on the example supplied by Mark
Thanks Mark
Credit should go to Eluze for the example menti
From: Trevor Daniels
> I've added a snippet based on the example supplied by Mark
> Thanks Mark
Credit should go to Eluze for the example mentioned.
I had nothing to do with it.
- Mark
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http:/
who's who?
Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> I've added a snippet based on the example supplied by Mark
> to the repository in a form which is suitable for inclusion
> in the selected snippets section of NR 1.7 Editorial annotations.
> It will appear in the docs in due course.
>
> See Avoiding collisi
I've added a snippet based on the example supplied by Mark
to the repository in a form which is suitable for inclusion
in the selected snippets section of NR 1.7 Editorial annotations.
It will appear in the docs in due course.
See Avoiding collisions of chord fingering with beams
Thanks Mark
Tr
codesite-noreply wrote:
>
> Issue 38: collision fingering beam
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=38
>
> Comment #2 by n.puttock:
> This is invalid.
>
i don't really understand what is invalid - there is a collision, it is not
readable and it is not what we are used from liy
Issue 38: collision fingering beam
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=38
Comment #3 by v.villenave:
OK thx.
Issue attribute updates:
Status: Invalid
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this
Issue 38: collision fingering beam
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=38
Comment #2 by n.puttock:
This is invalid.
Stems are deliberately excluded from the supports of fingerings inside
chords unless
'add-stem-support = ##t.
--
You received this message because you are list
Issue 38: collision fingering beam
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=38
Comment #1 by v.villenave:
(Reproduced with 2.11.47) It does only affect chords indeed.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred t
10 matches
Mail list logo