Updates:
Labels: -Type-Enhancement -Priority-Medium -Engraving-nitpick Type-Defect
Needs-design
Comment #7 on issue 298 by tdaniels...@googlemail.com: Ties do not appear
when shortened because of an accidental
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=298
I don't regard this as a
Updates:
Owner: ---
Labels: -Priority-Low Priority-Medium
Comment #6 on issue 298 by brownian.box: Ties do not appear when shortened
because of an accidental
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=298
Issues 840 and 1219 have other good samples.
_
Comment #4 on issue 298 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Ties do not appear when
shortened because of an accidental
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=298
Issue 1219 has been merged into this issue.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilyp
Updates:
Cc: lemzw...@googlemail.com
Comment #5 on issue 298 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Ties do not appear when
shortened because of an accidental
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=298
Issue 840 has been merged into this issue.
___
Issue 298: Ties do not appear when shortened because of an accidental
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=298
Comment #3 by n.puttock:
I encounter this issue all the time (also with ties avoiding flags);
would it be
considered bad style if the tie ignored the accidental in this ca
Issue 298: Ties do not appear when shortened because of an accidental
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=298
Comment #2 by v.villenave:
Yes indeed. IIUC:
%%%
\version "2.11.45"
\relative {
s2. 4~ | ~ 4 s2 |
}
% The upper tie does not appear, though the accidental
% is not pla
