Comment #4 on issue 2111 by elu...@gmail.com: documentation of
include-settings in Usage
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2111
hi James
sorry for the confusion i'm doing, partly due to my disorganized mind,
partly to the fact that many of these issues are only minor and i
Updates:
Status: Started
Owner: pkx1...@gmail.com
Comment #3 on issue 2111 by pkx1...@gmail.com: documentation of
include-settings in Usage
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2111
Eluze,
We have a few things going on here, so I'd like to break it down if only
lilypond-4 wrote:
>
>
>
and i forgot to tell that
--include, -I=directory
should be
-I, --include=directory
thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Issue-2111-in-lilypond%3A-documentation-of-include-settings-in-Usage-tp32989659p33017184.html
Sent from the Gnu -
Comment #2 on issue 2111 by elu...@gmail.com: documentation of
include-settings in Usage
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2111
i'd go for 3.
suggestions:
AU: Command line options for lilypond
The following options are supported:
(it's not sorted in version 2.15.22)
Comment #1 on issue 2111 by pkx1...@gmail.com: documentation of
include-settings in Usage
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2111
You didn't really give me much constructive to work with here.
The reason is probably because either no one has had an issue with it
before, no
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Documentation
New issue 2111 by ma...@gregoriana.sk: documentation of include-settings in
Usage
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2111
Following was sent to the bug-lilypond:
is there a reason why -dinclude-settings is not mentioned i
