Updates:
Status: Verified
Comment #12 on issue 1929 by philehol...@googlemail.com:
stem-tremolo-position.ly broken
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1929
(No comment was entered for this change.)
___
bug-lilypond mailing l
Updates:
Labels: -Fixed_215_14 Fixed_2_15_14
Comment #11 on issue 1929 by colinpkc...@gmail.com:
stem-tremolo-position.ly broken
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1929
(No comment was entered for this change.)
___
bug-lily
Updates:
Labels: Fixed_215_14
Comment #10 on issue 1929 by colinpkc...@gmail.com:
stem-tremolo-position.ly broken
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1929
(No comment was entered for this change.)
___
bug-lilypond mailing li
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #9 on issue 1929 by mts...@gmail.com: stem-tremolo-position.ly
broken
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1929
Fixed with 378c4c70504e4aa1141970050f20865da0c2f615.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-countdown Patch-push
Comment #8 on issue 1929 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: stem-tremolo-position.ly
broken
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1929
Counted down to 20110928
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-review Patch-countdown
Comment #7 on issue 1929 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: stem-tremolo-position.ly
broken
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1929
(No comment was entered for this change.)
___
bug-lil
Comment #6 on issue 1929 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: stem-tremolo-position.ly
broken
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1929
Some reg test differences again but trivial
Those aren't trivial changes; they show the bug being fixed!
__
Comment #5 on issue 1929 by mts...@gmail.com: stem-tremolo-position.ly
broken
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1929
Passes regtests, seems to correct all similar problems.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https:
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-new Patch-review
Comment #4 on issue 1929 by pkx1...@gmail.com: stem-tremolo-position.ly
broken
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1929
New patch passes make and make check;
Some reg test differences again but trivial
see attached.
Attachme
Updates:
Owner: mts...@gmail.com
Labels: Patch-new
Comment #3 on issue 1929 by pkx1...@gmail.com: stem-tremolo-position.ly
broken
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1929
(No comment was entered for this change.)
___
Comment #2 on issue 1929 by mts...@gmail.com: stem-tremolo-position.ly
broken
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1929
Hey all,
Keith is absolutely right.
I have a patch up that addresses this particular case - I need to run the
regtests to verify that it doesn't break anyth
Comment #1 on issue 1929 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: stem-tremolo-position.ly
broken
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1929
Caused by the stem-length change, 32570e8ac85561, between 2.15.8 and .9
(so I missed it in reviewing that big set of reg-test changes)
Looks easy to fix.
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Critical Regression
New issue 1929 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: stem-tremolo-position.ly broken
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1929
\header {
texidoc = "Tremolos are positioned a fixed distance from the
end of the beam. ..."
}
\rel
13 matches
Mail list logo
