Re: Issue 1624 in lilypond: Segfault with stabel and development versions

2011-05-02 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Verified Comment #10 on issue 1624 by brownian.box: Segfault with stabel and development versions http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1624 Yes, verified with 2.13.61, THANKS .) ___ bug-lilypond mailing list

Re: Issue 1624 in lilypond: Segfault with stabel and development versions

2011-05-02 Thread lilypond
Comment #9 on issue 1624 by anna.kuz...@gmail.com: Segfault with stabel and development versions http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1624 Verified with 2.13.61, THANKS! ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://list

Re: Issue 1624 in lilypond: Segfault with stabel and development versions

2011-04-29 Thread lilypond
Updates: Labels: -backport fixed_2_13_61 Comment #7 on issue 1624 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: Segfault with stabel and development versions http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1624 Backported ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-

Re: Issue 1624 in lilypond: Segfault with stabel and development versions

2011-04-29 Thread lilypond
Comment #8 on issue 1624 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: Segfault with stabel and development versions http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1624 Backported ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/li

Re: Issue 1624 in lilypond: Segfault with stabel and development versions

2011-04-26 Thread lilypond
Comment #6 on issue 1624 by brownian.box: Segfault with stabel and development versions http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1624 Ignore the "backport". Thanks, that was i was asking about. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypon

Re: Issue 1624 in lilypond: Segfault with stabel and development versions

2011-04-25 Thread lilypond
Comment #5 on issue 1624 by percival.music.ca: Segfault with stabel and development versions http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1624 2.15.0 is the lowest version of lilypond that we think it will work. Since 2.13.60 is lower than 2.15.0, you should not attempt to verify thi

Re: Issue 1624 in lilypond: Segfault with stabel and development versions

2011-04-25 Thread lilypond
Comment #4 on issue 1624 by brownian.box: Segfault with stabel and development versions http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1624 Sorry, what are "fixed_2_15_0" and "backport" ? This code still segfaults with 2.13.60. Please, what's the version to verify with?

Re: Issue 1624 in lilypond: Segfault with stabel and development versions

2011-04-19 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: fixed_2_15_0 backport Comment #3 on issue 1624 by percival.music.ca: Segfault with stabel and development versions http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1624 (No comment was entered for this change.) ___

Re: Issue 1624 in lilypond: Segfault with stabel and development versions

2011-04-19 Thread lilypond
Comment #2 on issue 1624 by mts...@gmail.com: Segfault with stabel and development versions http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1624 Fix pushed after clean regtests. 06722df9f31ec6a7b516605418d9598071544edc ___ bug-lilypond mailing

Re: Issue 1624 in lilypond: Segfault with stabel and development versions

2011-04-19 Thread lilypond
Comment #1 on issue 1624 by mts...@gmail.com: Segfault with stabel and development versions http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1624 I'm on it, patch soon. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mail

Issue 1624 in lilypond: Segfault with stabel and development versions

2011-04-19 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Critical New issue 1624 by philehol...@googlemail.com: Segfault with stabel and development versions http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1624 Reported by ornello: The code below causes a segfault \layout { \context { \