Updates:
Status: Verified
Comment #6 on issue 1601 by philehol...@googlemail.com: Autobeaming in 12/8
produces incorrect result
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1601
(No comment was entered for this change.)
___
bug-lilyp
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: fixed_2_13_59
Comment #5 on issue 1601 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: Autobeaming in 12/8
produces incorrect result
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1601
Fixed in commit e11e32a3a07
Regression test is input/regression/autob
Comment #4 on issue 1601 by bordage@gmail.com: Autobeaming in 12/8
produces incorrect result
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1601
I think anything else is correct. But to be sure, we need to gather a large
amount of examples from IMSLP (for example). And add clean reg
Updates:
Status: Started
Owner: carl.d.s...@gmail.com
Comment #3 on issue 1601 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: Autobeaming in 12/8
produces incorrect result
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1601
(No comment was entered for this change.)
__
Comment #2 on issue 1601 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: Autobeaming in 12/8
produces incorrect result
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1601
Do you consider the autobeaming to be correct for all except 6/8, 89/8, and
12/8?
Thanks,
Carl
_
Comment #1 on issue 1601 by bordage@gmail.com: Autobeaming in 12/8
produces incorrect result
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1601
Attached is a summary of autobeaming's behaviour.
Same issue with 9/8 and 6/8.
Attachments:
autobeam_regtest.ly 1.3 KB
_
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Critical Regression
New issue 1601 by philehol...@googlemail.com: Autobeaming in 12/8 produces
incorrect result
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1601
Reported by Bertrand Bordage:
"Why is there an exception for demis
