Comment #4 on issue 1418 by percival.music.ca: regtests "cells:" field
isn't documented in the CG
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1418
I'd rather not scrap it (at least, not long-term) -- a non-deterministic
use of memory sounds like a good, low-priority, no-rush project
Comment #3 on issue 1418 by han...@google.com: regtests "cells:" field
isn't documented in the CG
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1418
the "cells" is the amount of memory (as reported by GUILE) used during a
run of a test file. The idea was that sudden changes of memory
Updates:
Summary: regtests "cells:" field isn't documented in the CG
Labels: -Type-Documentation Type-Build
Comment #2 on issue 1418 by percival.music.ca: regtests "cells:" field
isn't documented in the CG
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1418
I don't see the
Comment #1 on issue 1418 by pkx1...@gmail.com: regtests "cells:" field
isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1418
Can this be merged into 1217?
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/m
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Documentation Maintainability Priority-Medium
New issue 1418 by v.villenave: regtests "cells:" field isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1418
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2010-11/msg00320.html
_
