Updates:
Status: Verified
Comment #24 on issue 1152 by brownian.box: Regression: collisions with
accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1152
(No comment was entered for this change.)
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bu
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #23 on issue 1152 by percival.music.ca: Regression: collisions with
accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1152
mao, forgot to close it.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.
Updates:
Labels: fixed_2_13_29
Comment #22 on issue 1152 by percival.music.ca: Regression: collisions with
accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1152
Original bug was fixed.
Comment #8 was already reported in issue 472.
Comment #11 was already reported in iss
Comment #21 on issue 1152 by percival.music.ca: Regression: collisions with
accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1152
That sounds reasonable. Could a Bug Squad person mark this one as fixed
(in 2.13.29), and make two separate issues for those other reports?
___
Comment #20 on issue 1152 by joeneeman: Regression: collisions with
accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1152
I still think this bug is fixed. The bug in comment 8 is not a regression
and the bug in comment 11 is about collisions between slurs and rests.
Neither
Comment #19 on issue 1152 by pnorcks: Regression: collisions with
accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1152
You're not doing anything wrong. It's a recent problem with Google code
hosting:
http://code.google.com/p/support/issues/detail?id=4266
Updates:
Labels: -fixed_2_13_29
Comment #18 on issue 1152 by percival.music.ca: Regression: collisions with
accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1152
*shrug* ok, I have no idea. I created that last image just like I used to
create all the previous ones.
Comment #17 on issue 1152 by percival.music.ca: Regression: collisions with
accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1152
another test, sorry.
Attachments:
foo.preview.png 1.7 KB
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-li
Comment #16 on issue 1152 by percival.music.ca: Regression: collisions with
accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1152
WTF?! I definitely expected that one to work. ok, let's try again, with
all lower-case.
Attachments:
foo.png 16.6 KB
___
Comment #15 on issue 1152 by percival.music.ca: Regression: collisions with
accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1152
Here's a re-uploaded image from comment 11. I suspect that google code is
case-sensitive about the .PNG portion. :(
Attachments:
Captur
Comment #14 on issue 1152 by joeneeman: Regression: collisions with
accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1152
By the way, the following is a minimal example for Reinhold's bug:
\version "2.12.0"
\layout {
\context {
\Score
\override SpacingSpanner #'commo
Comment #13 on issue 1152 by joeneeman: Regression: collisions with
accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1152
This is a different bug and not a regression (2.12.3 gives the same
behavior). It is tricky to fix because the cause is a cyclic dependency: we
cannot fo
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Comment #12 on issue 1152 by reinhold.kainhofer: Regression: collisions
with accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1152
(No comment was entered for this change.)
___
bug-lilypond mailing l
Comment #11 on issue 1152 by pkx1...@hotmail.com: Regression: collisions
with accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1152
Also this reminded me of something I had seen recently, and I apologise is
this not the same issue I am getting collisions on 2.13.29 here:
\re
Comment #10 on issue 1152 by pnorcks: Regression: collisions with
accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1152
Don't know why the previous attachment is not inlined...
Attachments:
snip.png 6.3 KB
___
bug-lilypond
Comment #9 on issue 1152 by pkx1...@hotmail.com: Regression: collisions
with accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1152
Here is the png file (preferred over pdf)
Attachments:
snip.PNG 15.5 KB
___
bug-lilypond mai
Comment #8 on issue 1152 by reinhold.kainhofer: Regression: collisions with
accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1152
I'm still running into collisions of accidentals with rests in 2.13.29...
Attached is a sample file (from a real project I'm working on right now)
Comment #7 on issue 1152 by lilyli...@googlemail.com: Regression:
collisions with accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1152
OK, I'll verify once I have 2.13.29
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lis
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: fixed_2_13_29
Comment #6 on issue 1152 by joeneeman: Regression: collisions with
accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1152
I maintain that this second issue is not a regression. If you change the as
to fes, you will se
Updates:
Status: Started
Labels: -fixed_2_13_27
Comment #5 on issue 1152 by lilyli...@googlemail.com: Regression:
collisions with accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1152
As advised to me on bug-lilypond I change the status of this issue.
_
On 7/9/10 9:21 AM, "lilyp...@googlecode.com"
wrote:
>
>
> Comment #4 on issue 1152 by lilyli...@googlemail.com: Regression:
> collisions with accidentals
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1152
>
> This has only partly been fixed.
> When running the snippet with 2.13.27 the f
Comment #4 on issue 1152 by lilyli...@googlemail.com: Regression:
collisions with accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1152
This has only partly been fixed.
When running the snippet with 2.13.27 the first collision (accidental and
preceding rest) is omitted but the
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: fixed_2_13_27
Comment #3 on issue 1152 by joeneeman: Regression: collisions with
accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1152
Thanks for bisecting.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
Comment #2 on issue 1152 by frederic...@m4x.org: Regression: collisions
with accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1152
Here is the guilty commit: ee0488f3aa19e0060b6e17c46a4d88cb9d57c489
commit ee0488f3aa19e0060b6e17c46a4d88cb9d57c489
Author: Joe Neeman <...>
Date:
Comment #1 on issue 1152 by frederic...@m4x.org: Regression: collisions
with accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1152
I am starting git bisect to find where it comes from.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.o
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Collision Priority-Critical Regression
New issue 1152 by pnorcks: Regression: collisions with accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1152
This is a regression between 2.13.24 and 2.13.25.
Original report:
http://lists.gnu.org/a
26 matches
Mail list logo
