Re: Issue 1123 in lilypond: 16th and shorter notes (not beamed) have ugly defects

Updates: Status: Verified Comment #11 on issue 1123 by brownian.box: 16th and shorter notes (not beamed) have ugly defects http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1123 (No comment was entered for this change.) ___ bug-lilypond m

Re: Issue 1123 in lilypond: 16th and shorter notes (not beamed) have ugly defects

Comment #10 on issue 1123 by csny...@mvpsoft.com: 16th and shorter notes (not beamed) have ugly defects http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1123 As expected, the forte glyph looks normal in 2.13.26. Thanks! ___ bug-lilypond mailing

Re: Issue 1123 in lilypond: 16th and shorter notes (not beamed) have ugly defects

Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: fixed_2_13_26 Comment #9 on issue 1123 by pnorcks: 16th and shorter notes (not beamed) have ugly defects http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1123 This problem was fixed as a result of the fontforge update in GUB.

Re: Issue 1123 in lilypond: 16th and shorter notes (not beamed) have ugly defects

Comment #8 on issue 1123 by brownian.box: 16th and shorter notes (not beamed) have ugly defects http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1123 Issue 1146 has been merged into this issue. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org

Re: Issue 1123 in lilypond: 16th and shorter notes (not beamed) have ugly defects

Comment #7 on issue 1123 by jann...@gnu.org: 16th and shorter notes (not beamed) have ugly defects http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1123 This is definitely not a GUB problem, it is fontforge-2010-05-01, which GUB used, incidentally. I've bumped GUB to today's GIT which seem

Re: Issue 1123 in lilypond: 16th and shorter notes (not beamed) have ugly defects

Updates: Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Build Comment #6 on issue 1123 by percival.music.ca: 16th and shorter notes (not beamed) have ugly defects http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1123 Most likely a GUB issue. ___ bug-lilypond

Re: Issue 1123 in lilypond: 16th and shorter notes (not beamed) have ugly defects

Comment #5 on issue 1123 by csny...@mvpsoft.com: 16th and shorter notes (not beamed) have ugly defects http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1123 I found a defect in the forte glyph at size 18 that's likely related to this. See the attachment for a comparison of the glyph at si

Re: Issue 1123 in lilypond: 16th and shorter notes (not beamed) have ugly defects

Comment #4 on issue 1123 by pnorcks: 16th and shorter notes (not beamed) have ugly defects http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1123 I am seeing these artifacts with both the PS and SVG backends with fontforge 20100501, and I never noticed a problem before upgrading from 200

Re: Issue 1123 in lilypond: 16th and shorter notes (not beamed) have ugly defects

Comment #3 on issue 1123 by brownian.box: 16th and shorter notes (not beamed) have ugly defects http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1123 No, 2.13.23 is ok. Well, i'm not sure about 8th notes (looks like "open" pathes? they may appear in 8th, who knows), sorry.

Re: Issue 1123 in lilypond: 16th and shorter notes (not beamed) have ugly defects

Comment #2 on issue 1123 by n.puttock: 16th and shorter notes (not beamed) have ugly defects http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1123 I doubt it. Jan bumped fontforge for woff fonts after 2.13.23. The mingw build's also broken. I had similar artefacts showing up recently whe

Re: Issue 1123 in lilypond: 16th and shorter notes (not beamed) have ugly defects

Comment #1 on issue 1123 by percival.music.ca: 16th and shorter notes (not beamed) have ugly defects http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1123 I assume that these defects are not present in 2.13.23? ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-

Issue 1123 in lilypond: 16th and shorter notes (not beamed) have ugly defects

Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Regression Priority-Critical New issue 1123 by brownian.box: 16th and shorter notes (not beamed) have ugly defects http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1123 \version "2.13.24" { c''16 c''32 c''64 c''128 } Every flag has "defects"