Updates:
Status: Verified
Comment #15 on issue 1056 by brownian.box: Pure-height of stems does not
accurately estimate height
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1056
(No comment was entered for this change.)
___
bug-lilypon
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: fixed_2_13_22
Comment #14 on issue 1056 by n.puttock: Pure-height of stems does not
accurately estimate height
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1056
(No comment was entered for this change.)
___
Updates:
Status: Started
Owner: shingarov
Labels: Patch
Comment #13 on issue 1056 by pnorcks: Pure-height of stems does not
accurately estimate height
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1056
(No comment was entered for this change.)
_
Comment #12 on issue 1056 by shingarov: Pure-height of stems does not
accurately estimate height
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1056
Ok, this was some kind of testing artifact. The patch appears good.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC
Comment #11 on issue 1056 by shingarov: Pure-height of stems does not
accurately estimate height
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1056
Hmm, hold on; this patch causes infinite recursion in some (but not all)
manuscripts.
--
You received this message because you are liste
Comment #10 on issue 1056 by shingarov: Pure-height of stems does not
accurately estimate height
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1056
Here is the patch:
http://codereview.appspot.com/908045
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of
Comment #9 on issue 1056 by n.puttock: Pure-height of stems does not
accurately estimate height
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1056
It's measured in half staff-spaces, so the default length is 7 (i.e., 3.5
staff-spaces).
calc_length () is what 'length is set to by defa
Comment #8 on issue 1056 by shingarov: Pure-height of stems does not
accurately estimate height
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1056
Ok, this is what I am going to do then.
The only two things that are not clear to me now, is (1) what is the
convention about
the units in
Comment #7 on issue 1056 by n.puttock: Pure-height of stems does not
accurately estimate height
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1056
The 'transparent property doesn't change the extent; try the following file
if you
don't believe me. :)
\relative c' {
\voiceTwo
\ove
Comment #6 on issue 1056 by shingarov: Pure-height of stems does not
accurately estimate height
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1056
Hi Neil,
The extent of a transparent grob is exactly the same as if it were
visible:
it still takes up space, so you'd expect both invisi
Updates:
Summary: Pure-height of stems does not accurately estimate height
Comment #5 on issue 1056 by shingarov: Pure-height of stems does not
accurately estimate height
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1056
I am not sure how one can change the description field, bu
11 matches
Mail list logo
