Re: Error compiling 1.6.20 and 1.8.1

2003-08-26 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I built gcc 3.2.3 and tried that for lilypong 1.8.1. It worked just > fine. Actually, I tried 3.3.1 first, which does not work, THEN I tried Can you send a bugreport? -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___

Re: Error compiling 1.6.20 and 1.8.1

2003-08-26 Thread Michael Edwards
Actually, the configure script stopped me from using it. Is that the intended behavior? On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 10:24, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > I built gcc 3.2.3 and tried that for lilypong 1.8.1. It worked just > > fine. Actually, I tried 3.3.1 first, which does n

Re: Error compiling 1.6.20 and 1.8.1

2003-08-26 Thread Michael Edwards
I built gcc 3.2.3 and tried that for lilypong 1.8.1. It worked just fine. Actually, I tried 3.3.1 first, which does not work, THEN I tried gcc 3.2.3. At any rate, I'm very happy with the result. Lilypond is fantastic. On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 07:01, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wri

Re: Error compiling 1.6.20 and 1.8.1

2003-08-26 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Didn't 1.6.6 have that silly bug in the font naming so that > you couldn't get correct PDF files. I don't understand what > the problem could have been with 1.6.10 (or 1.6.12) but I also don't understand, since nothing fundamental changed between the releases, but the c

Re: Error compiling 1.6.20 and 1.8.1

2003-08-26 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Didn't 1.6.6 have that silly bug in the font naming so that you couldn't get correct PDF files. I don't understand what the problem could have been with 1.6.10 (or 1.6.12) but I would definitely recommend 1.6.8 or newer to be able to get correct PDF files. /Mats Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: [EMAIL P

Re: Error compiling 1.6.20 and 1.8.1

2003-08-25 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Hmm, I can't really. I am able to use gcc 3.0.4 (unsuccessfully), but, > beyond that, it's a pretty major update to the system. > > The weird thing is, I get the compilation problem even with the stock > gcc and libc that come with the Redhat 7.3 distro. I figure it

Re: Error compiling 1.6.20 and 1.8.1

2003-08-25 Thread Michael Edwards
Hmm, I can't really. I am able to use gcc 3.0.4 (unsuccessfully), but, beyond that, it's a pretty major update to the system. The weird thing is, I get the compilation problem even with the stock gcc and libc that come with the Redhat 7.3 distro. I figure it's got to be something else, then, s

Error compiling 1.6.20 and 1.8.1

2003-08-25 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I get the same error when I try to compile either 1.6.12 or 1.8.1: > > mv out/lilypond.texi out/lilypond.nexi > chmod -w out/lilypond.nexi > makeinfo --output=./out/lilypond.info out/lilypond.nexi > cd ./out && /home/edwards/tarballs/lilypond-1.6.12/lily/out/lilypond >

Error compiling 1.6.20 and 1.8.1

2003-08-25 Thread Michael Edwards
I get the same error when I try to compile either 1.6.12 or 1.8.1: mv out/lilypond.texi out/lilypond.nexi chmod -w out/lilypond.nexi makeinfo --output=./out/lilypond.info out/lilypond.nexi cd ./out && /home/edwards/tarballs/lilypond-1.6.12/lily/out/lilypond --verbose /home/edwards/tarballs/lilypon