On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 7:56 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Well, if you now remove the Axis_group_engraver from Dynamics and add it
> to \DynamicsStaff, your results will be more consistent as no new axis
> groups get started. However, conflicting dynamics specifications will
> get pasted over each
Valentin Villenave writes:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:24 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> First you have to figure out what you want to happen here. Do you want
>> two Dynamics contexts with different orientation and settings? In that
>> case, you'll need to provide a superior context aliased to
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:24 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> First you have to figure out what you want to happen here. Do you want
> two Dynamics contexts with different orientation and settings? In that
> case, you'll need to provide a superior context aliased to Staff where
> it can anchor those
Valentin Villenave writes:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:24 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> But you did not put \\ in a DynamicsStaff context, so it has no suitable
>> container where it could place separate Dynamics contexts.
>
> Something like that?
>
> \layout {
> \context {
> \Staff
Remove
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:24 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> But you did not put \\ in a DynamicsStaff context, so it has no suitable
> container where it could place separate Dynamics contexts.
Something like that?
\layout {
\context {
\Staff
\type "Engraver_group"
\name "DynamicsStaf
Valentin Villenave writes:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 6:39 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> I'm having a weird time with that report. \\ is called a Voice
>> separator, so it separates voices.
>
> Well, yes :-)
> But for example, if you put \\ in a DrumStaff context, it will create
> DrumVoices and n
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 6:39 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> I'm having a weird time with that report. \\ is called a Voice
> separator, so it separates voices.
Well, yes :-)
But for example, if you put \\ in a DrumStaff context, it will create
DrumVoices and not spawn brand-new regular Voice and Sta
Valentin Villenave writes:
> Greetings everybody,
>
> I’m having a weird time today with the following code:
>
>
>
> \version "2.17.30" % Also with earlier versions.
>
> \new Dynamics { a1\f << a \\ b\p >> }
>
>
>
> The first bar works as expected; in the second all hell breaks loose:
>
Greetings everybody,
I’m having a weird time today with the following code:
\version "2.17.30" % Also with earlier versions.
\new Dynamics { a1\f << a \\ b\p >> }
The first bar works as expected; in the second all hell breaks loose:
notes are printed in newly-created Voice contexts,
