Hello,
On 27/02/14 09:06, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Paul Morris wrote Tuesday, February 25, 2014 7:44 PM
>
>> That means that this statement is potentially misleading:
>>
>> "Lily sometimes rejects explicit \break and \pageBreak commands. There are
>> two commands to override this behavior:"
> Well,
Paul Morris wrote Tuesday, February 25, 2014 7:44 PM
> That means that this statement is potentially misleading:
>
> "Lily sometimes rejects explicit \break and \pageBreak commands. There are
> two commands to override this behavior:"
Well, Lily does sometimes reject explicit breaks, for exampl
sed
\score {
\new Staff {
\repeat unfold 10 { c'4 c' c' c' }
}
\layout {
\context {
\Score
\override NonMusicalPaperColumn.line-break-permission = ##f
}
}
}
Maybe a clearer name for these commands would have been:
automatic-line-breaks = ##f
automatic-pa
James wrote Tuesday, February 25, 2014 5:58 AM
> On 24/02/14 21:18, Paul Morris wrote:
>> The example given here:
>> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/explicit-breaks
>
> While not addressing your suggestion directly, but being one of the few
> doc editors I am not sure this p
On 24/02/14 21:18, Paul Morris wrote:
The example given here:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/explicit-breaks
While not addressing your suggestion directly, but being one of the few
doc editors I am not sure this part of the Notation Reference has been
'touched' for a whi
The example given here:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/explicit-breaks
is not so good since the output is actually the same when you comment out the
commands that it is intended to illustrate:
% \override NonMusicalPaperColumn.line-break-permission = ##f
% \override NonM
