Hi all,
Graham Percival wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 09:05:26AM -0700, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>> I think that Graham wants to draw a distinction between Frogs, whose primary
>> purpose is to fix bugs in the code, and documentation developers, whose
>> primary purpose is to improve the documen
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
2009/1/11 Graham Percival :
Jonathan: another item for you.
Frogs, this could be a task for you guys.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2009-01/msg00035.html
Regards,
Valentin
Just so you'll know, I took care of this request ages ago when Graham
first
Graham Percival wrote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 05:35:07PM +0100, Valentin Villenave wrote:
2009/2/28 Graham Percival :
Yes, absolutely! Jonathan Kulp is handling (or learning how to
handle) normal doc updating tasks. I'm not certain if he signed
up as a Frog; if he did, this would contribute
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 05:35:07PM +0100, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> 2009/2/28 Graham Percival :
> > Yes, absolutely! Jonathan Kulp is handling (or learning how to
> > handle) normal doc updating tasks. I'm not certain if he signed
> > up as a Frog; if he did, this would contribute to this confu
2009/2/28 Graham Percival :
> Yes, absolutely! Jonathan Kulp is handling (or learning how to
> handle) normal doc updating tasks. I'm not certain if he signed
> up as a Frog; if he did, this would contribute to this confusion.
Actually, I did have Jonathan in mind, more or less, but I CCed to th
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 09:05:26AM -0700, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> I think that Graham wants to draw a distinction between Frogs, whose primary
> purpose is to fix bugs in the code, and documentation developers, whose
> primary purpose is to improve the documentation.
Yes, absolutely! Jonathan K
Valentin,
I think that Graham wants to draw a distinction between Frogs, whose primary
purpose is to fix bugs in the code, and documentation developers, whose
primary purpose is to improve the documentation.
To a certain extent I created some confusion between the two, because my
initial Frog tas
2009/1/11 Graham Percival :
> Jonathan: another item for you.
Frogs, this could be a task for you guys.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2009-01/msg00035.html
Regards,
Valentin
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://l
Jonathan: another item for you.
Don't worry about the formatting or the exact spacing; just shove
it in there, since NR 4 is slated for a complete rewrite in a few
months.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 12:03:51PM -0800, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Robin Bannister wrote:
> > Readers are not
Robin Bannister wrote:
> Readers are not told what size a point is;
> they have to work it out from the example given.
> So it is important to get this right: 105 mm
Another confusion readers may have is that staff-size and
staff-height seem to be used interchangeably, for example
in NR 4.2.1
> 148 millimeters, the height of a6 paper in landscape orientation
says v2.12 NR 4.6.1.
Readers are not told what size a point is;
they have to work it out from the example given.
So it is important to get this right: 105 mm
Cheers,
Robin
___
bu
11 matches
Mail list logo
