Comment #3 on issue 1250 by n.puttock: Default placement of string number
indication does not avoid sloping beam
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1250
Probably not, especially since they're really too big to look good close to
the notehead without either changing the
Comment #2 on issue 1250 by Carl.D.Sorensen: Default placement of string
number indication does not avoid sloping beam
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1250
Is there a reason *not* to have #'add-stem-support = ##t be the de
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Collision Priority-Medium
New issue 1250 by brownian.box: Default placement of string number
indication does not avoid sloping beam
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1250
Reported by Nick Payne:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug
Comment #1 on issue 1250 by brownian.box: Default placement of string
number indication does not avoid sloping beam
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1250
There is a workaround, posted by Xavier Scheuer:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2010-08/msg00560.html
On Tue 31 Aug 2010, 17:39 Nick Payne wrote:
> \version "2.13.31"
>
> \relative c'' {
> a'16[ e c a e a]
> }
>
> Nick
Thank you, added as 1250:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1250
--
Dmytro O. Redchuk
Bug Squad
___
bug-lil
On 31 August 2010 09:39, Nick Payne wrote:
>
> \version "2.13.31"
>
> \relative c'' {
> a'16[ e c a e a]
> }
You should use
\override StringNumber #'add-stem-support = ##t
It is documented in snippet "Avoiding collisions with chord fingerings"
NR 1.7.1 Inside the staff > Fingering instruct
\version "2.13.31"
\relative c'' {
a'16[ e c a e a]
}
Nick
<>___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
