Pierre Perol-Schneider writes:
> My Dear David,
>
> At the time I started this thread I was 100% sure that you would answer
> something like this. ;)
> Well, let's try to see former version :
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/essay/building-software, v2.14
> says: "f4"
> compare to
>
On 22.07.2016 15:18, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
It should be written :
{ 4 }
Without the {}, actually. They form a sequential music expression, and
that step comes only later.
and not:
<>
I agree that it should be corrected. While it works (in an explicitly
instantiated voice), I do
My Dear David,
At the time I started this thread I was 100% sure that you would answer
something like this. ;)
Well, let's try to see former version :
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/essay/building-software, v2.14
says: "f4"
compare to
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/essay/
But of course.
Sorry for my poor english : \relative c' { \new Voice { <> } }
shows ok (of course) but <> does not.
This essay is really nice, and I want to use it for a presentation. But I
found this particular part unclear.
Cheers,
Pierre
2016-07-22 17:56 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
> "Phil Hol
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> "Pierre Perol-Schneider" wrote in
> message
> news:caphotuwtxrmr97w5m2ajkt4sudvqdbd93tqudk0vfuogxh0...@mail.gmail.com...
>>I clearly understand what you mean.
>> Thing is that <> does not show what's on the picture (actually
>> the link says: \relative c' { \new Voice { <
Pierre Perol-Schneider writes:
> Hi James,
>
> Sorry for the misunderstanding.
> Have you tried the snippet ? Have you seen the result ?
>
> It should be written :
>
> { 4 }
>
> and not:
>
> <>
>
> Examples that follow should also be corrected.
Well, "corrected" is a hard word: they work as writ
"Pierre Perol-Schneider" wrote in message
news:caphotuwtxrmr97w5m2ajkt4sudvqdbd93tqudk0vfuogxh0...@mail.gmail.com...
I clearly understand what you mean.
Thing is that <> does not show what's on the picture (actually
the link says: \relative c' { \new Voice { <> } } )
So I think it is not clear.
I clearly understand what you mean.
Thing is that <> does not show what's on the picture (actually
the link says: \relative c' { \new Voice { <> } } )
So I think it is not clear. Maybe this line should simply be deleted and
the next example should be:
\relative { f' <> } (or simply { << g'2 \\ { f'
Pierre,
On 22/07/16 14:18, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
Hi James,
Sorry for the misunderstanding.
Have you tried the snippet ? Have you seen the result ?
No but the online help is built using LilyPond (these are not static
images). So the result should be the same as what is shown in that
Hi James,
Sorry for the misunderstanding.
Have you tried the snippet ? Have you seen the result ?
It should be written :
{ 4 }
and not:
<>
Examples that follow should also be corrected.
Cheers,
Pierre
2016-07-22 14:00 GMT+02:00 James :
> Pierre,
>
>
>
> On 22/07/16 12:46, Pierre Perol-Schn
Pierre,
On 22/07/16 12:46, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
I'm not top posting.
Hi Bug Squad,
See:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/essay/building-software.html#music-representation
I think that this part, especially the chords ('Simultaneous notes'),
should be re-written, e.g.:
\
> I'm not top posting.
Hi Bug Squad,
See:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/essay/building-software.html#music-representation
I think that this part, especially the chords ('Simultaneous notes'),
should be re-written, e.g.:
\version "2.19"
<>
Cheers,
Pierre
___
12 matches
Mail list logo
