2017-01-01 2:17 GMT+01:00 Andrew Bernard :
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> Here is an MWE showing an issue I encounter regularly with the
> parenthesizing of accents. It only occurs when using cross staff beaming
> which I use a lot.
>
>
>
> The reported error is:
>
> .
&
Am 01.01.2017 um 02:17 schrieb Andrew Bernard:
> Here is an MWE showing an issue I encounter regularly with the
> parenthesizing of accents. It only occurs when using cross staff beaming
> which I use a lot.
This is issue 4892, reported half a
Hi All,
Here is an MWE showing an issue I encounter regularly with the
parenthesizing of accents. It only occurs when using cross staff beaming
which I use a lot.
The reported error is:
.
programming error: Improbable offset for stencil: inf staff space
Setting to zero.
continuing
On May 29, 2011, at 3:00 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> On 5/29/11 5:42 AM, "Hilary Snaden" wrote:
>
>> Phil Holmes wrote:
>>> "Hilary Snaden" wrote in message
>>> news:4de210b3.80...@newearth.demon.co.uk...
Manual beamings of cross-staff note groups are mangled, but
inconsistently. The b
On 5/29/11 5:42 AM, "Hilary Snaden" wrote:
> Phil Holmes wrote:
>> "Hilary Snaden" wrote in message
>> news:4de210b3.80...@newearth.demon.co.uk...
>>> Manual beamings of cross-staff note groups are mangled, but
>>> inconsistently. The beaming in this extract works for the first 6 bars,
>>> then
Phil Holmes wrote:
"Hilary Snaden" wrote in message
news:4de210b3.80...@newearth.demon.co.uk...
Manual beamings of cross-staff note groups are mangled, but
inconsistently. The beaming in this extract works for the first 6 bars,
then fails on beats 1 and 3 on the following bars. (Beamings on bea
"Hilary Snaden" wrote in message
news:4de210b3.80...@newearth.demon.co.uk...
Manual beamings of cross-staff note groups are mangled, but
inconsistently. The beaming in this extract works for the first 6 bars,
then fails on beats 1 and 3 on the following bars. (Beamings on beats 2
and 4 are as th
Manual beamings of cross-staff note groups are mangled, but
inconsistently. The beaming in this extract works for the first 6 bars,
then fails on beats 1 and 3 on the following bars. (Beamings on beats 2
and 4 are as they were.) Versions 2.12.2, 2.13.61 and 2.13.62 behave in
the same way.
\ve
"Keith OHara" wrote in message
news:loom.20110503t193605-...@post.gmane.org...
Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes:
Could you check it with 13.60 or .61 to confirm it was wrong in a
previous
version? If it was, I assume it was a bug but that it's fixed in a
development version.
Phil,
Confir
Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes:
> Could you check it with 13.60 or .61 to confirm it was wrong in a previous
> version? If it was, I assume it was a bug but that it's fixed in a
> development version.
>
Phil,
Confirming that your example comes out wrong with 2.13.61 as released.
It starts
"Colin Campbell" wrote in message
news:4dbffdfe.7090...@shaw.ca...
On 11-05-03 02:14 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
I can't find a bug report that covers this issue. It was introduced
between
13.51 and 13.52 and gives faulty beaming when using manual cross-staff
beams. It remains in 13.61. Here's a
On 11-05-03 02:14 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
I can't find a bug report that covers this issue. It was introduced
between
13.51 and 13.52 and gives faulty beaming when using manual cross-staff
beams. It remains in 13.61. Here's an example cut down from my
initial 20
voice 500 bar sample that show
I can't find a bug report that covers this issue. It was introduced between
13.51 and 13.52 and gives faulty beaming when using manual cross-staff
beams. It remains in 13.61. Here's an example cut down from my initial 20
voice 500 bar sample that shows it - but it's not quite tiny. Could someo
2009/1/9 Andrew Hawryluk :
> The r16 in this example should appear in the lower staff ("PrimoLH"),
> but the cross-staff beaming forces it to float above the system.
Thanks, (finally) added as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=744
R
The r16 in this example should appear in the lower staff ("PrimoLH"),
but the cross-staff beaming forces it to float above the system.
Andrew
\version "2.12.1"
Iup = \change Staff = "PrimoRH"
Idown = \change Staff = "PrimoLH"
\relative c''
Thanks, I've added this info to 369.
Cheers,
- Graham
Neil Puttock wrote:
Hello,
I'm getting some strange behaviour with cross-staff beams when they are
combine with a slur which stays on one staff:
\version "2.11.29"
\paper{ ragged-right=##t }
\score {
\new PianoStaff <<
\context St
On 8/12/07, Neil Puttock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm getting some strange behaviour with cross-staff beams when they are
> combine with a slur which stays on one staff:
>
> \version "2.11.29"
> \paper{ ragged-right=##t }
> \score {
> \new PianoStaff <<
> \context Staff = r
Hello,
I'm getting some strange behaviour with cross-staff beams when they are
combine with a slur which stays on one staff:
\version "2.11.29"
\paper{ ragged-right=##t }
\score {
\new PianoStaff <<
\context Staff = rh \relative { c'8([ d) \change Staff = lh c,] }
\context Staff = lh
18 matches
Mail list logo
