On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 03:47:14PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Simon Albrecht writes:
>
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > in the following example, I would very much like the f arranged to the
> > right of the g. I have tried several solutions, but none worked, and
> > also I think that it ought to
Simon Albrecht writes:
> Hello everybody,
>
> in the following example, I would very much like the f arranged to the
> right of the g. I have tried several solutions, but none worked, and
> also I think that it ought to work without an \override command. Can
> anyone think of a solution?
> Thanks
Hello everybody,
in the following example, I would very much like the f arranged to the
right of the g. I have tried several solutions, but none worked, and
also I think that it ought to work without an \override command. Can
anyone think of a solution?
Thanks, Simon
Here’s the code:
\vers
Comment #8 on issue 2143 by janek.li...@gmail.com: accidental arrangement
should depend on tightness of music
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2143
More examples as promised. Most of them are from Peters editions.
Attachments:
example - flats in fourth.png 17.1
Comment #7 on issue 2143 by janek.li...@gmail.com: accidental arrangement
should depend on tightness of music
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2143
I've found a very nice example showing how close sharps can behave. Its
taken from an engraving of Chopin g-minor ba
Comment #6 on issue 2143 by janek.li...@gmail.com: accidental arrangement
should depend on tightness of music
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2143
Ok, i agree that aligning vertically sharps in sixth doesn't look good;
especially in Lily engraving (sharps from Feta
Comment #5 on issue 2143 by lemzw...@gmail.com: accidental arrangement
should depend on tightness of music
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2143
It's obviously a matter of tightness...
My feeling is that we should delay handling of non-standard alignment (this
is
Comment #4 on issue 2143 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: accidental arrangement
should depend on tightness of music
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2143
Schirmer's engraver for the Carl Mikuli edition followed the rules --
including aligning accidentals in octaves (issue 72
Comment #3 on issue 2143 by philehol...@gmail.com: accidental arrangement
should depend on tightness of music
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2143
FWIW, Elaine Gould allows accidentals a sixth apart to align when the upper
one is a flat, but says they should be offset
Comment #2 on issue 2143 by n.putt...@gmail.com: accidental arrangement
should depend on tightness of music
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2143
I agree with Werner. That example looks awful.
Unless I'm mistaken, the accurate box code deliberated prevents the s
Comment #1 on issue 2143 by lemzw...@gmail.com: accidental arrangement
should depend on tightness of music
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2143
I strongly disagree to align two sharp signs vertically for a sixth! This
looks really bad IMHO, even in the real-world
Status: Accepted
Owner:
CC: milimet...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Enhancement
New issue 2143 by janek.li...@gmail.com: accidental arrangement should
depend on tightness of music
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2143
depending on space available, accidentals should be
EMUXJHYXJFAREKASFUWYXG
A mutual friend believes that you two belong together and has set up a meeting.
Click here to accept the invitation:
http://ahottieiswhatiwant.com/confirm/?oc=53030836
The FREE dating place CREATED BY WOMEN
MKYCRRAVQNII
Click here if you do not wish to be invited again:
13 matches
Mail list logo
